Arnold went shopping at The Link with $80 to spend. He spent $12 on a belt and $20 for a shirt. wat is an inequality to represent how much he can spend on pants, x.
i need a awnser
please help
Do you have a guess?
no
Ok well he had $80, then he spent a total of $32 ($12 of a belt and $20 on a shirt). If he wanted to buy a pair of pants with the remaining money (x) it would have to be equal to or less than what he has left, right? Is this making sense?
no i dont get it do you think we can get some help from somebody you know.
huh
Yeah...I'm not sure how I could explain this differently. I'll give a shout-out to some people. @phi @AnswerMyQuestions @Whitemonsterbunny17 @iGreen @Cosmichaotic Do you guys think you could help him with this?
So $80 minus what he spent on the belt and shirt leaves him with how much?
$48 right? So if x is the cost of pants. Then \[x \le $48\]
That would be how much he has to spend on pants. Considering there is no tax.
\(80 - 20 - 12 \le x\) Where x = Pants
Simplify: \(60 - 12 \le x\) \(48 \le x\)
@rashional Can you give me a medal? :l
I'll give you one for explaining it properly. Thanks!
Oh, ty. @Cosmichaotic
wats the inequality
Both me and @Cosmichaotic posted it.
so its 60 -12 and the other sign
No. \(x \le 48\)
thats it
Yes
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!