Unitary Matrix Problem, Not sure about my work, can anyone verify it or suggest an alternative approach by trying independently ?
Second line of \(AA^*\), the 1,1 element should have a \(2\beta \delta i\) term.
\[\begin{align*}(-\beta+i\delta)(\beta-i\delta)&=-(\beta-i\delta)^2\\ &=-(\beta^2-2i\beta\delta-\delta^2)\\ &=-\beta^2+2i\beta\delta+\delta^2 \end{align*}\]
right, that cnhages many things \(γ^2+2iβδ+δ^2=(2δ)^2 \) now gives me nothing...
\(γ^2+2iβδ+δ^2=2δ^2\)
doesn't change the later part though
\(\gamma =-\delta \) in that also gives, \(\beta \delta =0\) ...
\[\begin{cases}\alpha^2+\gamma^2-\beta^2+\delta^2+2i\beta\delta=1\\ -2\alpha\beta-i\beta\gamma+\gamma\delta-i\beta\delta-\delta^2=0\\ 2\alpha\beta-i\beta\gamma+\delta\gamma-i\beta\delta-\delta^2=0\\ -\beta^2+2\delta^2+\alpha^2=1\end{cases}\] From the first equation you have \(\beta\delta=0\), which means (by plugging into the second equation) that \(\beta\gamma=0\).
right
so as of now i have \(\beta \delta =0 \\ \beta \gamma =0 \\ \alpha \beta =0 \\ \gamma = -\delta \)
from those , \(\alpha =\beta =\gamma =\delta =0\) :O
which is not possible
if it takes too much time to write alpha, beta, gamma delta, then write a,b,c,d
Just a moment, I need to work through this myself... \[\begin{cases}\alpha^2+\gamma^2-\beta^2+\delta^2=1\\ -2\alpha\beta+\gamma\delta-\delta^2=0\\ 2\alpha\beta+\delta\gamma-\delta^2=0\\ -\beta^2+2\delta^2+\alpha^2=1\end{cases}\] If \(\beta=0\) then \[(1)\begin{cases}\alpha^2+\gamma^2+\delta^2=1\\ \gamma\delta-\delta^2=0\\ \delta\gamma-\delta^2=0\\ 2\delta^2+\alpha^2=1\end{cases}\] Second/third equations give \(\delta=0\) and \(\gamma=\delta=0\), leaving you with \[\color{red}{\alpha=\pm1}\] If \(\gamma=0\) then \[(2)\begin{cases}\alpha^2-\beta^2+\delta^2=1\\ -2\alpha\beta-\delta^2=0\\ 2\alpha\beta-\delta^2=0\\ -\beta^2+2\delta^2+\alpha^2=1\end{cases}\] Second and third equations say \(2\alpha\beta=\delta^2\) and \(2\alpha\beta=-\delta^2\), so \(\delta=0\), leaving you with \[\color{red}{\alpha^2-\beta^2=1}\] If \(\delta=0\) then \[(3)\begin{cases}\alpha^2+\gamma^2-\beta^2=1\\ -2\alpha\beta=0\\ 2\alpha\beta=0\\ -\beta^2+\alpha^2=1\end{cases}\] Ugh, more cases... If \(\alpha=0\), then \[(3a)\begin{cases}\gamma^2-\beta^2=1\\ -\beta^2=1\end{cases}\] which gives \(\beta=\pm i\) and \(\gamma=0\). If \(\beta=0\), then \[(3b)\begin{cases}\alpha^2+\gamma^2=1\\ \alpha^2=1\end{cases}\] giving \(\alpha=\pm 1\) and \(\gamma=0\). All this algebra is making my head spin :(
Copy+Paste is a godsend :P
o my god! i have to discuss all those cases :O
I wasn't sure if that was necessary, so I went ahead and did it anyway lol
wish i could copy your latex word into my word file doc :P
i "should" combine case 2 and 3 right ??? because if beta is not 0 then necessarily, both gamma and delta are 0 right ?
Yeah that would make sense, though it looks like \(\gamma\) and \(\delta\) are destined to be 0 no matter what. Under case (1) you get \[A_1=\begin{pmatrix}\pm1&0\\0&\pm1\end{pmatrix}\] both of which are unitary.
The (3a) solution also works: \[A_{3a}=\begin{pmatrix}0&\mp i\\\pm i&0\end{pmatrix}\]
(3b) is the same as (1), so it works.
thanks! :)
No problem! Fun times. By the way, are \(\alpha,\beta,\gamma,\delta\) real or can they be complex?
nothing said in question, so i would assume real only! hope there are no more cases :P
If they're strictly real then (3a) can be tossed. Finally, just to check if (2) works: \[\begin{align*}A&=\begin{pmatrix}\alpha&-\beta\\ \beta&\alpha\end{pmatrix}\\ AA^*&=\begin{pmatrix}\alpha&-\beta\\ \beta&\alpha\end{pmatrix}^2\\ &=\begin{pmatrix}\alpha^2-\beta^2&-2\alpha\beta\\ 2\alpha\beta&\alpha^2-\beta^2\end{pmatrix}\\ &=\begin{pmatrix}1&-2\alpha\beta\\ 2\alpha\beta&1\end{pmatrix}\\ &=\begin{pmatrix}1&-\delta^2\\ \delta^2&1\end{pmatrix}\\ &=\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\ 0&1\end{pmatrix} \end{align*}\] Perfect!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!