Suppose f"(x)>0 for all x. Which is larger: f(3) or f(4)? f'(3) or f'(4)? f(3.1) or f(3)+f'(3)(0.1) I believe it's an application of the Mean Value Theorem, but I could be wrong as I am unsure how to do this.
Since \(f''(x)>0\), you know that the first derivative is a strictly increasing function, so you can answer the second question right away.
just as f' is the change in f(x) with x f'' is the change in f' with x if f'' is positive that means the change in f' is increasing (i.e. the slope of the function is increasing)
Given the function then, If for all \[x \ge 0\] in some interval I then is concave up on I. -------------------- If for all \[x \le 0\] in some interval I then is concave down on I. There fore f(4) > f(3), same goes for first derivatives
f(x) * is concave up on I *** f(x) * is concave down on I ***
however, notice for a parabola the slope is very negative and is always increasing as we move to the right along the x axis.|dw:1406144383002:dw|
For the first pairing. You could have a function that looks like this |dw:1406144362891:dw| which is concave up \((f''(x)>0)\) and the derivative is increasing (approaching 0 from a negative value) with \(f(3)>f(4)\).
However you could have |dw:1406144495746:dw| so I don't think a conclusion can be reached...
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!