What is the difference between the terms “not guilty” and “innocent?”

It cannot be proved that an individual is “innocent.” Juries say “not guilty” because guilt was not proved in the case.

The terms have no significant difference in meaning. Juries and judges use them the same way in a court of law.

“Not guilty” is a verdict used in criminal cases only. However, an “innocent” verdict can only be used in civil cases.

A jury will say “innocent” instead of “not guilty” if the person seems to have had no part in the case before the court.

Question

What is the difference between the terms “not guilty” and “innocent?”

 It cannot be proved that an individual is “innocent.” Juries say “not guilty” because guilt was not proved in the case.

 The terms have no significant difference in meaning. Juries and judges use them the same way in a court of law.

 “Not guilty” is a verdict used in criminal cases only. However, an “innocent” verdict can only be used in civil cases.

 A jury will say “innocent” instead of “not guilty” if the person seems to have had no part in the case before the court.

anonymous · Answer

If someone charges you with a certain crime, the judge/jury are there to decide whether you are guilty, or not guilty of the crime in question. Stating that you are innocent would technically generally speak about your life and personality in a way that you've never done anything bad in life. Not guilty, on the other hand, can and is used to express specifically what you are not guilty of, for example not guilty of killing my workmate.

anonymous · Answer

medal?

anonymous · Answer

@tylercollins

anonymous · Answer

that doesnt give a straight up answer
@denyspro