More about \[\large \sqrt{2x+1} = 2x - 5\] The other night I solved this by factoring, not squaring the two sides. This got: \[\large (\sqrt{2x+1} - 3)(\sqrt{2x+1} +2) = 0\] One factor gives 4, which is the correct root. The other stops at \[\large \sqrt{2x+1} = -2\] which I think means an imaginary root. I'm calling the "ghost" of the extraneous root I would have introduced if like a sane person I had squared both sides. Does anyone have a better explanation or description of what is going on here?
factoring is the same as squaring , i mean when u factor u go back squaring again to get an answer ..
now , 6 is also solution but u couldnt get is by factor , right ?
@ikram002p I don't think 6 is a solution at any step of the process. It is the y (or f(x)) intercept. But that is not a solution for x.
sorry i means 3/2 xD
But 3/2 is not even on the curve of the problem as stated. It is another function assuming a minus sign on the radical. The red part of the graph is the given function.
well , as i said before factoring is the same as squaring , that means u dnt stop at sqrt 2x+1 =-2 as long as u get an answer of x>=-1/2
say \(\large \sqrt{2x+1} = w\) your factorization is equivalent to \(\large(w-3)(w+2)\)
Hey Lars, try squaring both sides
lars u have to consider after squaring it would be like |2x+1| =(2x-5)^2
which is a second degree polynomial, so the other root is not surprising however it is extraneous to the original equation cuz you cannot factor it like that... lets see what information the equation is missing when we factor it
ya that's what i was saying ikram
Whoops! I meant \[ \large (2x+1) - \sqrt{2x+1} - 6 = 0 \]
sqrt(2x+1) = (2x-5) => 2x + 1 = (2x-5)^2
Yes. I know how to square both sides, but that introduces an extraneous root.
which is 2x + 1 = 4x^2 + 25 - 20x
You know the quadratic formula?
4x^2 - 22x + 24 = 0
which is 2x^2 -11x + 12
Now you can use the factor method here.
But I don't need the quadratic formula because it factors.
Yeah. You can use factor method. It will be quicker.
What could be quicker than this? \[ \begin{align} \sqrt{2x+1} &= 2x - 5 \cr \sqrt{2x+1} - 2x + 5 &= 0 \cr 2x - \sqrt{2x+1} - 5 &= 0 \cr (2x+1) - \sqrt{2x+1} - 6 &= 0 \cr (\sqrt{2x+1} - 3)(\sqrt{2x+1} +2) &= 0 \end{align}\]
Here you need to work with roots. The best thing is to eliminate the roots first and solve the equation. You square both sides to eliminate the roots.
ok?
i see no hartm in this sqrt 2x+1 =-2 :(
@LarsEighner , we're not done with solving : \[\large \sqrt{2x+1} = -2 \] solve this factor too, what do u get ?
@ikram002p The root of what number is a negative number?
It's right. If sqrt. ( 2x + 1) = -2 2x + 1 - (-2)^2
well , its ok if u got x >=-1/2 and as u said before using complex numbers , and it might lead u to a real root at the end
@ganeshie8 I think I get (3/2)i
no! square both the sides os the factor sqrt ( 2x + 1) = -2
which is 2x + 1 = 4
if thats correct, then there you have your other root :) (3/2i is not extraneous, it is a properr complex root) what further explanation are you looking for ?
so x = 3/2
3/2i doesn't look correct though...
:'(
it won't be 3i/2. Just 3/2
yes it would be 3/2 and extraneous, precicely because we have squared both sides haha!
yeah @ganeshie8
we always need to carry constraints when we do things like : \(x=a\implies x^2=ax \), constraint here is \(x \ne 0\)
um?
in the original equation, the inherent constraint is \(\large \sqrt{2x+1} \ge 0\)
yeah. i think
sqrt 2x+1 =-2 assume 2x+1 =u then sqrt u= -2 sounds like complex to me , but also frusted xD
ok , i think the trick with domai range as ganesh stated |dw:1407484887495:dw| in both cases we would only get x=4 as an answer
by definition sqrt is nonnegative @ikram002p are you trying to solve : \[\large \sqrt{z} = -2\] \(z\) some complex number ?
hehe i tried :3 but then it made no sense , since |z|=4 not the same to sqrt z =-2
shooo , i have nothing else to say
At \[\large (2x+1) - \sqrt{2x+1} - 6 = 0\] I am about to factor it as if it is: \[\large a^2 - a - 6 = 0\] where \(a = \sqrt{2x+1} \) Did I go wrong here?
nope , it was correct lars
nothing wrong, only one constraint is missing... just add \(a\ge 0\) in your second line.
yess !
So when I get here \[\large \large \sqrt{2x+1} = -2 \] I cannot solve this without squaring it, but that creates the extraneous root?
well after trying i dont think there is extraneous root to solve it :o
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!