Definite Integrals
Suppose \[\Large \int\limits_{2}^{8}g(x) dx=5\] and \[\Large \int\limits_{6}^{8} g(x) dx= -3\] Find the value of \[\Large \int\limits_{4}^{12} g(2x) dx \]
I got \[\Large \int\limits_{2}^{6}g(x)dx+\int\limits_{6}^{8}g(x)dx=5\] \[\Large \int\limits\limits_{2}^{6}g(x)dx=5-\int\limits\limits_{6}^{8}g(x)dx\] \[\Large \int\limits\limits_{2}^{6}g(x)dx=5-(-3)=8\]
@campbell_st or @Compassionate can I have some help?
u are absolutely correct
Ok, where do I go from there
8 is the answer
promise me a medal...:P
I'm trying to find \[\Large \int\limits\limits_{4}^{12} g(2x) dx\], all of that up there was what i could get from the question that I know of
are you acquianted with the properties of definite integral?
Yeah
I should add the answer choices are 8 12 16 4
take 2x=k..dk=2dx... now the integral looks like g(k)dk*1/2.. u will need to change limits too...the limits will be reduced by half so essentially ur integral becomes limit 2,6 (g(k)*dk*.5)..now change the variable to x u have limit (2,6) (g(x)dx*.5) thats 4..oops i was wrong..its half of 8
get it?
Hold on, I'm working it through
Wouldn't the limits be doubled?
@amriju
double
pellet
m an retriceole
Lol, it's ok, in that case that they are doubled it would now look like \[\Large \frac{1}{2} \cdot\int\limits\limits_{8}^{24}g(k) dk\]
take 2k=x...put it in the integral limit (2,6)
How come 2k=x?
i think now it should come
take that assumption and substitute x by k in limit(2,6) (g(x)dx)
x by 2k
is kf(x) the same as f(kx)?
No, cause kf(x) all the y values are multiplied by a factor of k while f(kx) changes the x values by the value of k and then it's evaluated in the function
kf(x) deals with vertical stretches/ compression while f(kx) deals with horizontal stretches and compression
correct so why did you use 1/2 as a constant after doubling the limits of integration? http://finedrafts.com/files/CUNY/math/calculus/Spivak/Michael%20Spivak%20-%20Calculus.pdf
What page would I be turning to?
*scrolling
I did the k-substitution of k=2x then dk=2 dx dk/2=dx and then to find the upper and lower limits if we keep g(k) is (12) upper-> 2(12)=24 (4) lower-> 2(4)=8 The limits get doubled there and we plug all that in
provisional definition of a function in chapter 3 then jump to definite integral
that is too early use of a substitution, is it even required?
I'm not sure, i was just going along with the other person
laughing out loud
Help :0, I did a whole bunch of substituiton problems in this lesson then they ask me this question that I didn't see before
did u do it?
Yeah, but I'm being told it's not right, can you help @ganeshie8
why cant u substitute x by 2k?
Which part, before or after I did the sub
x=2k...so dx=2dk g(x)dx=2g(2k)dk..limit will change to double... now u know
im getting this : \[\Large \int\limits\limits_{1}^{3} g(2x) dx = 8\]
for x<2 and x>8, we don't even know how the function g(x) behaves, so we cannot calculate the area between 8 and 24 for g(x).
Ok, so what's next
And I thought \[\Large \int\limits\limits\limits_{2}^{6} g(2x) dx = 8\]
|dw:1407487785777:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!