Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 16 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

can anyone help me with mathematical induction please?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

1^2 + 4^2 + 7^2 + ... + (3n - 2)^2 = quantity n times quantity six n squared minus three n minus one all divided by two

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yes

OpenStudy (amistre64):

can you put that in mathematical notation

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay so i did the left side and ended up with 18k^2-6k+5

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes of course

OpenStudy (anonymous):

1^2+4^2+7^2+...+(n(6n^2-3n-1))/2

OpenStudy (amistre64):

is there a restriction on n? like for all positive integers, or n>2 or some such? otherwise, what is it we are trying to prove by induction?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i need to do n=k n=k+1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i already did n=1

OpenStudy (amistre64):

so you are trying to prove that this holds true for integers 1,2,3,... just so i can catch up, let n=1 to verify. (3n-2)^2 = n(6n^2-3n-1)/2 (3-2)^2 = (6-3-1)/2 (1)^2 = (2)/2 , is good now, let n=k is simple enough, right? 1^2+4^2+7^2+...+(3k-2)^2 = k(6k^2-3k-1)/2 we good to here?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes and now you plug in k+1

OpenStudy (amistre64):

not quite. we add the next term to each side: the next term is (3(k+1)-2)^2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

alright

OpenStudy (amistre64):

let P(k) = 1^2+4^2+7^2+...+(3k-2)^2 therefore, P(k) = n(6n^2-3n-1)/2 P(k+1) = P(k) + (3(k+1)-2)^2

OpenStudy (amistre64):

now we need to reduce it to a format that looks like we replaced k with k+1

OpenStudy (amistre64):

pfft, i got some ns straggling in my post :/

OpenStudy (anonymous):

(3k+3-2)^2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ns?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

we need to show that:\[\frac{k(6k^2-3k-1)}{2}+(3(k+1)-2)^2=\frac{(k+1)(6(k+1)^2-3(k+1)-1)}{2} \]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yeah, when i was rewriting the left side in a few posts up i forgot to replace n with k :/

OpenStudy (anonymous):

how did you get that

OpenStudy (amistre64):

how did i get what?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohh it's okay no worries ... the one above :yeah, when i was rewriting the left side in a few posts up i forgot to replace n with k :/

OpenStudy (amistre64):

mathematical induction is all about form, if we know one form is good, then we need to develop a way to get the next term, the (k+1)th term, is in the same exact form.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

as such, we know that the form:\[\frac{k(6k^2-3k-1)}{2}\]is of good form we need to add the next term to it, the next term is defined as:\[(3(k+1)-2)^2\] and show that the added term simplifies/reduces to the same form, namely:\[\frac{(k+1)(6(k+1)^2-3(k+1)-1)}{2}\] as if we simply replaced k by (k+1)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yea that was my problem i wasn't sure how to add it to the fraction, so basically you just put it on top of the 2

OpenStudy (amistre64):

lets follow the setup this way, do we agree that:\[1^2+4^2+7^2+...+(3k-2)^2=\frac{k(6k^2-3k-1)}{2}\] ???

OpenStudy (amistre64):

we know it is true for some k, namely k=1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the next term to add, the (k+1)th term is simply added to each side: \[1^2+4^2+7^2+...+(3k-2)^2 +\underbrace{(3(k+1)-2)^2}\\~~~~~~~~~~~=\frac{k(6k^2-3k-1)}{2}+\underbrace{(3(k+1)-2)^2}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay i see what you mean

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the left side is simply redundant, we need to show that the right side simplifies to the proper FORM

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so we don't do anything to the left?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

nope, the left is just listing all the terms up to the (k+1)th term. the right side is what we need to deal with.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

okay :)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

so, the rest is just algebraing it to death to get it transformed into:\[\frac{k(6k^2-3k-1)}{2}+\underbrace{(3(k+1)-2)^2}=^?\frac{(k+1)(6(k+1)^2-3(k+1)-1)}{2}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yea that's the part i need help on if you don't mind.. I need to show the steps

OpenStudy (amistre64):

well, get it all into one fraction to start with ... any ideas how to do that?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i was thinking of multiplying by 2/2

OpenStudy (amistre64):

thats the way to go about it yes :) the process is really elementary, just cluttered is all \[\frac{k(6k^2-3k-1)+2(3(k+1)-2)^2}{2}\] what would you attempt next?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

distribute it so: 2(3k+2)-2)^2 2(3k)^2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

3k*3k=2(9k)=18k

OpenStudy (amistre64):

expanding it all out to get rid of the groupings would be a fine idea, then we can attempt to factor out a (k+1), lets ignor the /2 part since it has no part to play in the process at this time \[k(6k^2-3k-1)+2(3(k+1)-2)^2\] \[6k^3-3k^2-k+(12(k+1)-8)^2\] \[6k^3-3k^2-k+(12k+12-8)^2\] \[6k^3-3k^2-k+(12k+4)^2\] \[6k^3-3k^2-k+144k^2+48k+16\] \[6k^3+141k^2+47k+16\] now to see if i did it right by checking with the wolf lol

OpenStudy (anonymous):

how did you get 12 and 8

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i tried to do something fancy and messed myself up is all :) if i had done it normally, we would have gotten to \[6 k^3+15 k^2+11 k+2\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that's what i got but over 2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but they don't match that's the problem

OpenStudy (anonymous):

are they supposed to match?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yeah, the over 2 at the moment is clutter; what doesnt match?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

my left and right... for my left i got 18k^2-6k+5 and for my right i got 6k^3+15k+11k+2/2

OpenStudy (amistre64):

there is no 'left' to deal with. lets factor out a (k+1), either by longhand, or synthetic division

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so i wasn't supposed to solve the left

OpenStudy (amistre64):

we are not on the same page at the moment, ive either forgotten what a left is, or im thinking of something else. so far we have gotten:\[\frac{k(k^2-3k-1)}{2}+(3(k+1)-2)^2\]and worked it down to\[\frac{6k^3+15k+11k+2}{2}\] since we need a (k+1) times [....]/2, lets factor out a (k+1) by some means and see what that leads to 6k^3+15k+11k+2 0 -6 -9 -2 -1 6 9 2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ohhh okay got it.... so it would be:

OpenStudy (anonymous):

isnt 15k squared because in mine it's squared

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yes :) typing and mathing do not always coexist in peaceful harmony so, by synthetic division method 6k^3+15k^2+11k+2 0 -6 -9 -2 -1 6 9 2 0 this reworks to\[\frac{(k+1)(6k^2+9k+2)}{2}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

|dw:1407778784467:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!