Question

State law recognizes that the owner of a vehicle is the person or company whose name appears on the title, or legal and official ownership document. The state also recognizes payment agreements that people and businesses make through official, legal means.
A young woman says her neighbor agreed to purchase her old car. She agreed to accept payments from him on a monthly basis until he paid off the car and trusted that he would honor this plan. She signed ownership over to him on the title, which he also signed. She says that he has not made any payments and still has possession of the car.

Answer 1

@Lyssa123

Answer 2

@morningskye123

Answer 3

@KlOwNlOvE

Answer 4

Are there choices?

Answer 5

for the first 2 ye but not for the last one

Answer 6

Is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? How do you know? Civil law. I know that it is civil law because
Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination How do you know?
Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? Explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. Use details from the scenario to support your answer.
Do you think the young woman has a valid argument that her neighbor owes her payment for the car? In other words, should government make an exception to the law about the owner being the person whose name is on the title? Use details from the scenario to support your answer.

Answer 7

This is a civil law because it took place between two people over legal documents. That's right

Answer 8

I can't give you all the answers but basically the person who gave over the title and everything to the person owns the car becasuse she doesn't have proof anymore that she owns that car unless she went to a lawyer and signed in in front of them

Answer 9

If she excepted the payments first then handed over the title then the situation is different

Answer 10

I hope that helps somewhat

Answer 11

Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination How do you know? And what about this part

Answer 12

hmm... I would say a combination because it represented as a statute (law). I can't tell you the rest because I forgot. Give me 10 minutes

Answer 13

brb

Answer 14

ok, yeah. A regulation against giving away the title and a case law because for those who had problems transition money and the vehicle

Answer 15

which one is that 2?
@morningskye123

Answer 16

what's number 2?

Answer 17

oh, i'm not sure. you ask what does this represents

Answer 18

Are those one question? or two separate ones?

Answer 19

the person who gave over the title and everything to the person owns the car because she doesn't have proof anymore that she owns that car unless she went to a lawyer and signed in in front of them. What was this part to?

Answer 20

oh ok, you should have made that clear

Answer 21

the 2nd one

Answer 22

Is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or combination? How do you know?

Answer 23

wrong one

Answer 24

Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? Explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. Use details from the scenario to support your answer

Answer 25

What the what?

Answer 26

I'm really confuse here. Is all this one question?

Answer 27

Determine the purpose of the law related to the scenario. Is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? Explain your response and thoughts on what could happen if the law did not exist. Use details from the scenario to support your answer. This is all 1 question this part i just sent you

Answer 28

ok. The law was created to protect people's safety because you have the right to own processions but your possessions don't have rights. So, the only way to protect them is a law stating they are protected or have procedures to keep them safe. Like the old lady who lost her car that wouldn't have happen if she follow the procedures and if the didn't exist then it would be hard to fight in court to testify that the guy didn't pay her for the car.

Answer 29

prossessions*

Answer 30

Thx for the help

Answer 31

@morningskye123