Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 8 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

When looking at a rational function, Bella and Edward have two different thoughts. Bella says that the function is defined at x = −1, x = 2, and x = 4. Edward says that the function is undefined at those x values. Describe a situation where Bella is correct, and describe a situation where Edward is correct. Is it possible for a situation to exist where they are both correct? Justify your reasoning. This is what I have These are the roots that make up the function (x+1)(x−2)(x−4)

OpenStudy (tkhunny):

Well, start describing. Here's a rational function that is defined everywhere. f(x) = (x+1)(x−2)(x−4) Here's a rational function that is defined at none fo the 3. g(x) = 1/[(x+1)(x−2)(x−4)] No need to overthink it.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Wow. BOOOOOOOM (mindblown) Thanks :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!