here's your question dude
\[\frac{ \tan \beta-\sin \beta }{ \tan \beta+\sin \beta }=\frac{ \sec \beta-1 }{ \sec \beta+1 }\]
there you go prove that
I wasnt able to answer that
I like a challenge :)
You want me to simply prove it or guide YOU through proving it?
guide me... It was a quiz of 3 questions I didnt answer any
Okay, give me a sec...
Bloody hell
Okay, start from the right-hand side \[\Large \frac{\sec\beta -1}{\sec\beta+1}\]
And you can just multiply this by \[\large \frac{\sin \beta}{\sin\beta}\] which is just 1... Can you do that?
Hey, @EngrChong hi...
Wait how was that?
How was what?
I thought you were only to solve for one side
Its either the lrft hand side or the right hand side
No, what you're supposed to do here is to take one side and somehow turn it into the other side by using identities or other such clever manipulations, like multiplying 1.
You could also start from the left-side and go in reverse... it's really up to you, but try the first method I posted...
What identities could you use?
You only need a pair of basic ones, actually... \[\Large \sec\beta = \frac1{\cos\beta}\]and\[\Large \tan\beta = \frac{\sin\beta}{\cos\beta}\]
yup obviosly reciprocal and quotient identities
Yes, so let's take that right-hand side \[\Large \frac{\sec \beta-1}{\sec\beta +1}\] And multiply it by \(\Large \frac{\sin\beta}{\sin \beta}\) And we get \[\Large \frac{(\sin\beta)(\sec\beta -1)}{(\sin\beta)(\sec\beta +1)}\] right?
yeah right
You get it? Okay, you distribute... \[\Large \frac{(\sin\beta)(\sec\beta) - \sin\beta}{(\sin\beta)(\sec\beta)+ \sin\beta}\] Can you already see where this is going?
Wait how did it become sin B?
These? \[\Large \frac{(\sin\beta)(\sec\beta) - \color{red}{\sin\beta}}{(\sin\beta)(\sec\beta)+ \color{red}{\sin\beta}}\]
yup
Distribution ^_^ \[\Large \frac{(\sin\beta)(\sec\beta -1)}{(\sin\beta)(\sec\beta +1)}\] remember that, say, in the numerator, sinB is distributed to both secB and the -1
oh yeah i forgot
Okay, so from here \[\Large \frac{(\sin\beta)(\sec\beta) - \sin\beta}{(\sin\beta)(\sec\beta)+ \sin\beta}\] It's pretty obvious where this is going, right?
Let me see
Cancel stuff?
\[\Large (\sin\beta)(\sec\beta) = (\sin\beta)\left(\frac{1}{\cos\beta}\right)\]\[\Large \color{white}{(\sin\beta)(\sec\beta)} = \left.\frac{\sin\beta}{\cos\beta}\right.\]\[\Large \color{white}{(\sin\beta)(\sec\beta)} = \tan\beta\]
Get it? :)
\[\frac{ \tan \beta-\sin \beta }{ \tan \beta+\sin \beta }\]
Yup. Precisely. So, Wasn't that just fun? :)
Oh God it was that easy and wasnt able to answer it????????????The hell is wrong with me?
Nothing. It was easy, but it was FAR from obvious ^_^ Tips?
yeah sure...
Okay, when proving identities, you have your pencil and paper, you don't have to typeset stuff and all, so you can write complicated stuff pretty easy... so.... WHEN PROVING IDENTITIES, start with the more complicated side, say, the left side, since it has more trig functions... and THEN try to reduce everything ONLY in terms of sines and cosines.
There's actually two more questions
So... what you do here, let's try starting from the left... \[\Large \frac{\tan\beta - \sin\beta}{\tan\beta +\sin\beta }\]
ok
It's not yet completely in terms of sines and cosines, you have tan. So let's replace tan with sin/cos \[\Large \frac{\frac{\sin\beta}{\cos\beta}-\sin\beta}{\frac{\sin\beta}{\cos\beta}+\sin\beta}\]
I don't guarantee that expressing everything in sines and cosines gets you there right away, but it helps... it REALLY helps. Here, you can see that you can actually factor out sinB :) \[\Large \frac{(\sin\beta)\left(\frac1{\cos\beta}-1 \right)}{(\sin\beta)\left(\frac1{\cos\beta}+1 \right)}\]
We can cancel out the sinB, and we know that 1/cosB is equal to secB \[\Large \frac{\cancel{(\sin\beta)}\left(\color{blue}{\sec\beta}-1 \right)}{\cancel{(\sin\beta)}\left(\color{blue}{\sec\beta }+1 \right)}\]
Voila \[\Large \frac{\sec \beta-1}{\sec\beta +1}\]
how sin b got cancelled?
You can cancel any factors on the numerator AS LONG AS they have a partner in the denominator. Here we had a factor of sinB in both numerator and denominator, so it cancels out. Think numbers... We know one third is the same as two sixths, and why? Well, because... \[\Large \frac26 =\frac{2(1)}{2(3)}=\frac{\cancel2(1)}{\cancel2(3)}=\frac13 \]
oh i see
here's another one
\[\frac{ \sec \beta-\cos \beta }{ \sin^2 \beta }=\sec \beta \]
Easy >:)
But it requires a different method...
yup pythagorean
I'll admit that proving trig identities is tricky, because there is no ONE method to do it... you need experience... so let me demonstrate.
OH, so you already know how to answer this?
didnt complete it because of lack of confidence
Please show me what you did. I'll push you in the right direction if you stagger :)
it becme like this \[\frac{ \sec \beta-\cos \beta }{ 1-\cos^2 }\]
Okay... we could work from that... do you have a next step?
none got stuck there
I see. Could you turn the numerator into 1-cos^2B ?
Just remember... \[\Large (\cos\beta)(\sec\beta) = 1\]
The tricky step here is to multiply the left-side by \(\Large \frac{\cos\beta}{\cos\beta}\) ^_^
|dw:1408282704346:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!