log(log(x²))+log(log(x-4))=1 What I tried so far: log(log(x²)*log(x-4))=1 log(x²)*log(x-4)=10 Stuck here, ideas?
log(x²)*log(x-4)=10 2log(x)*log(x-4)=10 log(x)*log(x-4)=5 after that hmm...
Thought of doing that too, but lead me nowhere. The answer claims to be 10^5, but I don't see how.
It sort of works if I remove part of the problem and make it log(log(x²))=1 And even then it's ±10^5
That is not the correct answer. If you are allowed to use graphing calculator you can plot log(x)*log(x-4)-5 and see where it crosses the x-axis. If you are not allowed to use a graphing calculator you can solve it using trial and error. The answer is \(x \approx 11.6584\)
Can you post a screenshot of the problem?
Then 11.6584 is the correct answer and not 10^5.
I just checked it in the calc function, the log flank equals to 1.698968... and not 1
Seems like an error in the textbook indeed, thanks for verifying it's a mistake, now I can die in peace.
lol. yw.
\(\log(\log x - 4 ) \ne \log(\log(x-4))\)
good catch. glad I asked you to post the screenshot. In reproducing the problem you have posted an extra pair of parenthesis around x-4.
I think you should be able to solve it with a quadratic near the end
log(x²) * { log(x)-4 } =10 2log(x) * { log(x)-4 } =10 log(x) * { log(x)-4 } = 5 {log(x)}^2 - 4log(x) - 5 = 0 Let t = log(x) t^2 - 4t - 5 = 0 (t-5)(t+1) = 0 t = 5, t = -1 log(x) = 5, log(x) = -1. x = 10^5, x = 10^(-1) = 0.1. The second solution may be extraneous.
Yes, the second solution is extraneous and can be discarded because when x = 0.1, log(log(x) - 4) in the original problem becomes log of a negative number which is not allowed.
thanks guys
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!