Can I please have help? @campbell_st
@amistre64 @e.mccormick
Can we start with question 2
Please help me, I beg
@phi @ganeshie8
any functions of more than 1 operation come to mind?
6x + 1h - 1
thats more of a function of 2 variables, which isnt what i think the question is asking for
How, so should I do it?
lets say f(x) is the name of our function: we define f(x) by some rule or mathematical sentence: f(x) = (x-1)/4 is some definition for f(x) that provides us with 2 operations (addition and division). agreed?
ok
if this is truely a function then if f(a)=f(b) only if a=b; let a,b be any real number and set up the situation that f(a) = f(b) and see if we can reduce it to a=b
Ok, I understand
(a-1)/4 = (b-1)/4 a-1 = b-1 a = b
Is (a-1)/4 = (b-1)/4 our function or f(x) = (x-1)/4 is?
our function has a name, and a definition. we use the definition to prove that our function is actually a function
I see...okay!
so our definition proves a = b, correct?
your materials should define how to prove a function is a function; your job is to pretty much repeat it in your explanation.
Whizh question does it answer, 2 or 3 or 4?
the one that says to prove the function is a function of course ....
one question says top define a function with 2 operations another says to prove its a function another says to solve for a specific value of x
im having issues with how i defined a function; since its based from memory ... how does your material define the method for proving a function is a function?
example: f(x) = x^2 since for some x=a: a^2 only has one value associated with it.
but say a = -2, and b=2 a^2 = b^2 does not imply that a=b
Okay it just implies a^2 = b^2 nothing else
right, so its not a good memory recollection on how to prove a function is a valid function :)
Understood
@amistre64 the definition you gave is for one-to-one functions. Still a valid way to show your function is indeed a function, though.
yeah, but its only valid for a 1-1 function .... was trying to recall a more general proof.
spose our function is: x*x + 1 2 operations, it is a function. how to show it?
I am lost, what was our function?
Right. The one-to-one definition is the horizontal line test, whereas any function would be the vertical line test. In terms of math, that would be something like \[f(x)\text{ is a function if you can map a single output to any one input}\] if that makes sense...
'our function' is still defined up above
the last question makes me wonder if we are not spose to make an invertible function to start with.
Can we do that
we can, but you really need to consult your material to see how they define a 'true' function.
this assessment is just trying to get you to repeat what the lesson material mentions.
It didn't state a thing
in order for you to find an inverse, at least without restricting a domain, is to have a 1-1 function ... in which the f(a) = f(b) implies a=b would do the trick.
I am not sure how to make our function into that
f(x) = (x-1)/4 is a one to one function, and implies that f(a) = f(b) only iff a=b
so our function was already 1 to 1?
as defined, yes
So we finished? Or we have to find how to find the inverse?
since our function is 1-1, then by default, there is a unique y value for any given x value.
we find an inverse such that f(f'(x)) = x and f'(f(x)) = x using our definition: f(f'(x)) = (f'(x)-1)/4 x = (f'(x)-1)/4 4x = f'(x)-1 4x+1 = f'(x) therefore: f(f'(x)) = (4x+1)/4 = x does f'(f(x)) = x? try it out: 4(4-1)/4 + 1 = x
*** edit ... try it out: 4(x-1)/4 + 1 = x
Okay
then our inverse is f'(x) = 4x+1
I have to do the new one
not sure what a new one is ....
4(x-1)/4 + 1 = x equals all real numbers
f'(x) = 4x+1 is our inverse?
yes, and it shows that for any f(x) we can determine what x should be spose f(x) = 5 5 = (x-1)/4, we can solve for x
yes: f'(x) = 4x + 1 would be the inverse of our defined f(x)
Thank you so much!
good luck with it all :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!