Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 16 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

I've been brainstorming this answer for an hour now--I'm admitting temporary defeat. If you are taking the time to answer me, please explain your logic. I really want to learn how to do this rather than getting just an answer. Below is my nemesis. Fill in the blank to make the expression an equivalent equation. 2-x/-x-3 = ?/x+3

OpenStudy (amistre64):

grouping symbols would be nice

OpenStudy (amistre64):

and really, just multiply thru by x+3 assuming thats a denominator

OpenStudy (anonymous):

By grouping symbols I'm assuming you want it to be all put together like this\[\frac{ 2-x }{ -x-3} =\frac{ ? }{ x+3}\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

thats even better yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Do you know how to solve this? I dont care if you dont give me the answer, If you can break it down for me I'll try to solve it myself and check my answer with you

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i do yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the thing that is messing me up is the negative in front of the x...

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the key is in getting 'like' denominators some how. tell me, for what multiplier, n, does: n(x+3) = -x-3 ??

OpenStudy (anonymous):

a plain ol negative

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yep, so, the key is to realize that the bottom on the left is just -(x+3) move the negative to the top

OpenStudy (amistre64):

a/-b = -a/b

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but then my tops will be different, but maybe I'm processing wrong

OpenStudy (anonymous):

following you so far

OpenStudy (amistre64):

you are trying to determine a suitable top ... \[\frac{a}{-b}=~\frac{?}{b}\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[\frac{-1}{-1}\frac{a}{-b}=~\frac{?}{b}\] \[\frac{-a}{b}=~\frac{?}{b}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But for my homework the only part I'm allowed to change is the ? part.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

you cant change a question mark, you are trying to solve for the question mark

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So you are saying that eventually this will come to a point where I can insert my value for (?) ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lol I hope my ? dont cancel

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yes there are many ways to approach a solution, the first thing i suggested was: \[\frac{a}{-b}=~\frac{?}{b}\] multiply thru by the b \[\frac{a}{-b}\frac{b}{1}=~\frac{?}{b}\frac{b}{1}\] \[a\frac{b}{-b}=~?\frac{b}{b}\] \[a(-1)=~?(1)\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the key i spose is in recognizing that -x-3 = -(x+3)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Give me a min to write down what I'm understanding so far

OpenStudy (amistre64):

a whole minute ... i dont think i have that kind of time

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I wish I had a piece of paper to write it out for you-- i'm painfully slow with the equation button

OpenStudy (amistre64):

im adept at non equation button too

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I am understanding that my equation can be broken in to 2-x/-(x+3) = ?/x+3 hence I need to put a - times x+3 getting an identical denominator -(x+3). Then I will need to add my other equation's top to the right one to make them equal. So I would add a 2-x to my right, but since I multiplied the bottom by a -, I need to multiply my top by the same, coming out with \[\frac{ 2-x }{ -(x+3)}=\frac{ -2+x }{ -(x+3) }\] But then wont my negatives on the top right cancel and then my answers are not equivalent?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

you need to work the process, and let it come to the end of it on its own.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

My big brother doesn't know how to explain this in person so don't feel bad I'm not catching on yet--thanks for taking this much time for me!

OpenStudy (amistre64):

simplest way see this is by multiplying by some useful form of 1: -1/-1 = 1 so we dont change a thing, just the way something looks: \[\frac{2-x}{-x-3}=\frac{k}{x+3}(\frac{-1}{-1})\] \[\frac{2-x}{-x-3}=\frac{-k}{-x-3}\] now, if 2 things are equal, then their parts are equal hence: 2-x = -k, multiplying both sides by -1 changes form, not value -(2-x) = -k(-1) -(2-x) = k = x-2

OpenStudy (amistre64):

notice how the process is a mathical one, and we are not changing values, we are just changing the way things look to find a solution

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Like one side being a whole apple and the other being a whole apple chopped up, same but look different

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yes, and so we simply have to chop up one side, and sometimes glue the other, in order to make them conform to what they need to be to see that they are both the same thing

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So, are you saying that -2+x is my answer for the ? part? Or am I missing some glue? :p

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I probably am

OpenStudy (amistre64):

thats the answer, the glue has dried and the final results are set

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I had already figured that out but it didn't seem right... Are you sure?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

(ahem, well I guess I had figured out "several" right answers) /:

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i am sure that if:\[\frac a{-b}=\frac{k}{b}\] then k=-a, yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But isn't my answer a/-b=-k/-b ?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

no, your answer is k=____

OpenStudy (amistre64):

part of the process is that a/-b = -k/-b but part of the process is not the final results, k=____ is the final result

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm not getting it, sorry for taking up so much time. This is what I get for trying to tackle problems ahead of time. if you have any revelation for how to explain it further, I'd love it, but dont feel like you have to keep showing me.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

can you tell me why you think the answer is: a/-b = -k/-b how does this tell us what k is equal to?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

spose you were asked the question ... who won the game last night? but you reply with, i have to use the bathroom first. now, is the person wanting an answer going to believe that you using the bathroom is the answer to who won the game? or are they going to wait for you to come back and finish answering the question?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Lucky me my chrome just kaput. Now I'm back.reading your question...

OpenStudy (amistre64):

:)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Wait for me to come back.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

lol

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yeah, so ... saying a/-b = -k/-b is not the answer to "what is k?" it is simply a step along the way. the answer is of the form: k=_____

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So you are saying that k= -2+x won the game?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

yes

OpenStudy (amistre64):

which may need to be written as k = x-2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

despite the negatives canceling?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ohhh but then they would not cancel if you wrote it that way

OpenStudy (amistre64):

negatives arent canceling; we are introducing negatives to change the form that the problem is in

OpenStudy (amistre64):

some basic properties that can change form but not value are: adding a useful form of 0 multiplying by a useful form of 1 these are called identity properties other processess involve doing the same thing to each side of an equation, usually by making something add to 0, or divide to 1 these are called inverse properties other than that there is a distribution process which is really just multiplication/factoring

OpenStudy (amistre64):

n(a+b) = (a+b) + (a+b) + ... + (a+b) (a+b) added to itself n times as such, we have nas, and nbs that we can regroup as: na + nb this is called distribution, and when we undistribute, we simply factor out the common n again

OpenStudy (amistre64):

-x-3, undistributes to get us to -(x+3)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I plugged our answer into mathway (filled the blank spot with 2-x) to see what it said, it says "division by 0" does this confirm or deny our hypothesis?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

What you have typed above is making a lot of sense to me.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the blank spot is x-2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oops

OpenStudy (amistre64):

and im not sure what mathway is

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Mathway is a site people sometimes use to double check answers

OpenStudy (anonymous):

But I like having someone to talk to that can explain the why behind the answer

OpenStudy (anonymous):

*cite

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i googled the site, and this is what i get

OpenStudy (amistre64):

since i used y in this case: if y = 2-x then we have: -x-3 = x+3, solving for x -2x-3 = 3 -2x = 6 x = -3 as such, x+3 = 0 and -x-3 = 0 in which case we would have gotten a divide by zero error

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Do you enjoy math? Is that why you help me and other people?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i like not being bored out of my mind ... sometimes this helps :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

What does your username mean? (last non math related question)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

does it say " a mystery 64?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

(you can probably tell I love english)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

its just my name shortened up. back when AOL was the thing, they suggested amistre464, and i would get the same question... anthony mistretta, the 64 is just a keepsake from those old days

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That makes sense.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So here is my plan--I am trusting in your answer and going with x-2 for our "glued up apple." I do understand how we came to this conclusion, but now as well as I would like. I'm going to show my big brother when he comes home and see if he can further explain it to me.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

good luck with that plan :) my internet closes with the library so im headed home to yell at the tv and harass the nurses ...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok-Hope you are not too bored for the rest of today. Thank you for taking the time to help me out, amistre64. It meant a lot to me. Bye :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!