--
what is your question?
we have 1/x x = 0 so replace x with 0, since x = 0, to get 1/x = 1/0 what do we get when we try to evaluate 1/0 ?
yes because you cannot divide by zero
so what kind of discontinuity?
good
what do you mean?
correct, for the same reason (you cannot divide by zero)
sure go for it
for the 1+ kx , its x greater than or equal to 5
for each piece, what happens when x = 5?
for the first it turns into 15 - k and the second 1+5k
so if we want this function to be continuous at x = 5, this must mean that the two pieces produce the same y output when x = 5
so essentially, they must be equal to each other when x = 5, so 15 - k = 1+5k now you solve for k
@jim_thompson5910
I'm getting the same answer, nice job
great!!
first factor the numerator and denominator
hmm now that I look at it, this is a cubic which is a pain to factor also, the cubic is x^3 - 3x^2 - 2x + 1 right?
ok got it
I don't think x^3 - 3x^2 - 2x + 1 factors at all
is there a typo in x^3 - 3x^2 - 2x + 1 ?
oh is it x^3 - 3x^2 - 2x + 6 ?
ok I get (x^2 - 2)(x-3) now
the x-3 terms cancel
what discontinuity is associated with what we just canceled out?
no, x = 3 is removable because we have that cancellation
when you cancel out x-3, you are left with (x^2 - 2)/(x+3)
x = 3 is allowed in the domain of (x^2 - 2)/(x+3) so there are no discontinuities at x = 3 in (x^2 - 2)/(x+3)
however, to make sure the original expression (x^3 - 3x^2 - 2x + 6)/(x^2-9) and the expression (x^2 - 2)/(x+3) are equivalent, we have to remove x = 3 from the domain this is because x = 3 causes problems for the first expression
it is a removable discontinuity based on the reasoning I gave above
I recommend you compare the graphs of (x^3 - 3x^2 - 2x + 6)/(x^2-9) and (x^2 - 2)/(x+3)
one sec
I'm graphing using geogebra and I'll attach it
actually that wont work, nvm
notice how in the first expression (x^3 - 3x^2 - 2x + 6)/(x^2-9), if we plug in x = 3, we get 0 in the denominator however, if we plug that same value x = 3 into (x^2 - 2)/(x+3) we don't get 0 in the denominator
so x = 3 causes problems for (x^3 - 3x^2 - 2x + 6)/(x^2-9) but not for (x^2 - 2)/(x+3)
the two expressions (x^3 - 3x^2 - 2x + 6)/(x^2-9) and (x^2 - 2)/(x+3) are effectively equal they produce the same outputs for every x value in their domains...it's just that the first expression has a slightly different domain: it excludes x = 3 while the second does not exclude x = 3
to ensure the two expressions are fully equivalent, for all input x values, we must exclude x = 3 from both expressions so that is why x = 3 is a removable discontinuity
hopefully this makes sense?
no, by default if you don't mention "exclude or kick out x = 3" the second expression (x^2 - 2)/(x+3) would happily allow x = 3 into the domain x = 3 works just fine: it produces some y value when you plug it in
so you have to add in those instructions to ensure the two expressions are equal for all allowed x values
I'm not sure what you're asking to be honest
are you asking about the steps to simplify?
that's ok
and yes, you factor and then cancel out the common terms to simplify
well the first step is to find all of the discontinuities of the original expression
what are those discontinuities?
the original denominator is x^2 - 9
set that equal to zero and solve for x
don't worry about the cancellation yet
just focus on solving x^2 - 9 = 0
doing that gives x = -3 or x = 3
now when you cancel out the x-3 terms, only x+3 is left x+3 means x = -3 when you set it equal to zero so notice how the discontinuity x = 3 was removed
technically it's still a discontinuity
hmm not sure what else to add
but you can think of them as a point you remove from the graph (a single point) contrast that with a vertical asymptote
I can help when you get back
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!