Question

The Supreme Court ruled in Miranda v. Arizona that people <<<<<<<<<

under arrest as juveniles have many of the same rights as adults

accused of crimes have the right to a second trial upon request

who cannot afford an attorney must be provided one by the state

that are under arrest must be read their rights by law enforcement

Answer 1

Summary of Miranda v. Arizona---
Miranda v. Arizona, (1966) dealt with the need for individuals in police custody to understand their constitutional rights before being questioned by police. The specific protections addressed are the Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate oneself, and the Sixth Amendment right to legal counsel. The "fundamentals of fairness" standard, derived from the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause, demands that the accused be aware of his (or her) options in dealing with police so he can make informed decisions and not unwittingly act against his best interest.

Answer 2

so whats the answer

Answer 3

never mind

Answer 4

you got it from what i said