Relativistic momentum question
A proton has momentum with magnitude p0 when its speed is 0.400c. In terms of p0, what is the magnitude of the proton’s momentum when its speed is doubled to 0.800c? I'm not entirely sure how to do this problem?
So, I'd use \[\large p = \frac{ mv }{ \sqrt{1-\frac{ v^2 }{ c^2 }} }\] which is the relativistic momentum, so mv = p0?
So \[v^2 = (0.8c)^2?\] that's the part that troubles me the most, I guess. I'm just starting relativity so I'm trying to understand the process/ concept.
\[\huge p = \frac{ p_0 }{ \sqrt{1-(\frac{ 0.8c }{ c }})^2 }\] this way we could cancel out the c's. Not entirely sure though.
@Isaiah.Feynman @jim_thompson5910 Hey, do you guys have any idea how to approach this problem?
Not yet.
Alright, no worries, thanks anyways :P
Feynman was instrumental in the Manhattan Project, so I am sure this is like playing tic-tac-toe to him
I'm just trying to confirm if I did it correctly. So, \[p = \frac{ p_0 }{ \sqrt{0.36} }\] so solving this, \[p = 0.6 p_0\]
the equation looks legit
Lol, but I'm not sure if I'm putting all my variables correctly, I think there's something I'm missing, not sure.
are you asking me if \[p_0 = 0.400c = mv? \]
Yes, that's part of it
Well I'd think \[p_0 = m(0.400c)\]
so what is your relativistic mass?
But the question would want p = in terms of p0...and I doubt the mass would be there and we'd have to leave p0 there.
shouldn't you use \[m_{rel} = \frac{m}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}\]
Well from what I think, could be wrong, the mass at 0 velocity is m, so I don't think that would work.
relativistic momentum \[p = \gamma mv\]
HAHA you know the question is a trick one it is just asking when v is doubled
SMH!
Yeah, but still getting the wrong answer >.<
you doubled v right?
Yeah, I replaced v UNDER the squareroot as 0.800c
\[\large p = \frac{ mv }{ \sqrt{1-\frac{ v^2 }{ c^2 }} } \implies \frac{ p_0 }{ \sqrt{1-\left( \frac{ 0.800c }{ c } \right)^2} }\]
IDK
it looks legit
Right?
that is what I would have done
maybe you're just punching the numbers wrong in the calculator
That could be it, one sec, let me try again.
Oh wait, I'll use wolframalpha :P
make sure you use proper parentheses to break things down properly
Yeah, wolfram is getting the same thing as me, but it's wrong, mhm.
let me see put the link of the wolfram calculation
Tricky question, it's probably right in front of our eyes, but we haven't noticed it.
kinda tripping me up now I've recently taken this
I am going to read my textbook then get back with you
Alright thanks, I'll try working it out, and if I get it, I will definitely let you know.
http://finedrafts.com/files/CUNY/Physics/University%20Physics%20with%20Modern%20Physics,%2013th%20Edition.pdf pp. 1243 let us both look at it
I think that's what it is the relativistic mass has to be taken into account
Hey, I just scrolled down to the answers and it says 3.06p0, but I want to know how they got that?
try calculating rel p at 0.800 by itself
Not getting it
then I am going to wait for the heavy weight physics enthusiast here @ganeshie
Haha, I think I got a few more ideas...I'll get back to you.
@nincompoop Hey I got it
\[P = \gamma m v~~~~P_0 = \gamma_0 m v_0\] \[\gamma = (1-(v/c)^2)^{-1/2} ~~~~ \gamma_0 = (1-(v_0/c)^2)^{-1/2}\] \[\gamma = 1.67~~~~\gamma_0 = 1.09\] \[m = \frac{ p }{ \gamma v }~~~~m_0 = \frac{ p }{ \gamma_0 v_0 }\] \[\frac{ p }{ \gamma v }= \frac{ p_0 }{ \gamma_0 v_0 }\] now solving for p \[p = \frac{ \gamma }{ \gamma_0 }*\frac{ v }{ v_0 } p_0 \implies \left( \frac{ 1.67 }{ 1.09 } \right)\left( \frac{ 0.8 }{ 0.4 } \right) = 3.06p_0\]
:) told ya laughing out loud
Haha, I was reading the book and was like eh lets give this a shot and it worked :P, it's one thing having the answer but knowing the process is wayyy more intriguing to find.
calculate it separately and compare just like when you're doing gravity vs elec force
good job
you can download the book and keep it I used it
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!