The graph of a piece-wise defined function is given. Write a definition for the function that best describes this graph.
**open to see graph**
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
OpenStudy (anonymous):
@jim_thompson5910 here's the question
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
you essentially have 2 linear equations being combined here
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
so the idea is to find the equation of each piece
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
what is the equation of the left piece?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
no clue
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
what points lie on this left line?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
(-3,2),(0,0)
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
what is the slope of the line that goes through those two points
OpenStudy (anonymous):
3/-2?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
incorrect
OpenStudy (anonymous):
sorry -2/3
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
better
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
what is the y-intercept of that line?
OpenStudy (anonymous):
0?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
so the equation of that left piece is
\[\Large y = -\frac{2}{3}x + 0\]
which turns into
\[\Large y = -\frac{2}{3}x\]
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
it is only defined when x is between -3 and 0
ie when \[\Large -3 \le x \le 0\]
OpenStudy (anonymous):
so the answer would be f(x)=-2/3 if −3≤x≤0
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
\[\Large y = -\frac{2}{3}x\] not just -2/3
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
but yeah with that condition on x
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
hopefully you see how to do the other piece
OpenStudy (anonymous):
is is the same way?
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
yes pretty much
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
same method, just different points
OpenStudy (anonymous):
ok!! thank you!
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
OpenStudy (anonymous):
could you help me with one more problem please?
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
sure
OpenStudy (anonymous):
If f(x)=int (4x),find:
(a.) f(2.7)
(b.) f(2.2)
(c.)f (-2,8)
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
the int function just has you round down to the nearest integer
examples
int(3.2) = 3
int(4.7) = 4
int(6.8) = 6
int(-7.1) = -8
one thing to note: you do NOT go from -7.1 to -7, you would head down to the nearest integer which is -8. I think to think of it as you place the number line vertically and you head down to the floor of the next number.
something like this
http://www.pearsoned.ca/highered/divisions/economics/images/Fg_-03.gif
OpenStudy (anonymous):
I did what you said...but it says i'm incorrect?
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!
Sign Up
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
what did you get for each
OpenStudy (anonymous):
i got 8 for the first one...cause i rounded down 2.7 to 2 and plugged that in for x
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
f(x) = int (4x)
f(2.7) = int (4*2.7)
f(2.7) = int (10.8)
f(2.7) = 10
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
you round after you multiply
jimthompson5910 (jim_thompson5910):
because you do the inner stuff first in the parenthesis, then move onto the outer stuff
Still Need Help?
Join the QuestionCove community and study together with friends!