For the limit below illustrate the definition by finding the largest possible values of δ that correspond to ε = 0.2 and ε = 0.1 lim x->2 (x^3-4x+1)=1 if ε = 0.2 the largest possible value for δ is: if ε = 0.1 the largest possible value for δ is: You don't have to solve the problem, just walking me through how to do the problem step by step would help immensely. Thanks!
Did you try using the epsilon delta proof:
definition*
\[\lim_{x \rightarrow c}f(x)=L\] says: \[\text{ For all } \epsilon>0 \text{ there exists } \delta >0 \text{ such that} \\ \text{ for all } \text{ } x \text{ } 0<|x-c|<\delta => |f(x)-L|<\epsilon\] So if we chose epsilon to be 0.01 and f(x)=x^2-x and c=1. Then L=0. So we have \[ \text{ there exists } \delta >0 \text{ such taht } \\ \text{ for all } x \text{ } 0<|x-1|<\delta \\ |f(x)-L|=|x^2-x-0|<0.01\] .... Or try to look at this: Solve both of the equations for x: \[f(x)=L+\epsilon\] \[f(x)=L-\epsilon\] Then choose the x that is closest to x=1. Then plug that x into |x-c|
So we have \[x^2-x=.01\] x=1.009 x=-0.00990195 \[x^2-x=-.01\] x=.98989898 x=.0101021 The x that is closest to our c=1 is.... x=1.009 So we have \[0<|x-1|<\delta\] So plug in x=1.009 |1.009-1|=|.009|=.009 We will choose that number to be our delta... We still should be able to close by letting delta be between 0 and 1/2 So we have 0<|x-1|<delta if we choose delta to be between 0 and 1/2 we have |x-1|<1/2 -1/2<x-1<1/2 1/2<x<3/2 So we also have \[ |f(x)-L|=|x^2-x-0| =|x|*|x-1|<\epsilon\] So This means \[|x-1|<\frac{\epsilon}{|x|}\] x is between 1/2 and 3/2 So \[|x-1|<\frac{ 2 \epsilon}{3}\] \[|x-1|<\frac{2}{3}(.01)=\frac{1}{150}\] but as you see the delta from before was larger than this one so that method above might be better
A slightly different (but fundamentally similar) approach would be to prove the limit using the definition, then plugging in the given \(\epsilon\). \[\begin{align*}\left|x^3-4x+1-1\right|&=\left|x^3-4x\right|\\\\ &=|x||x+2||x-2|\\\\ &<3\times5~|x-2|&\text{(agree to set }\delta\le1)\\\\ &<\epsilon \end{align*}\] which would mean \(\delta=\min\left\{1,\dfrac{\epsilon}{15}\right\}\). For \(\epsilon=0.2\), you have \(\delta=\dfrac{0.2}{15}=\dfrac{2}{150}\), and for \(\epsilon=0.1\), \(\delta=\dfrac{1}{150}\) (as freckles has shown).
your delta is 2/150=1/75
oops nevermind
looking at the other epsilon and didn't look anything in between
I wonder if that method gives us the largest delta He is looking for largest delta
I think you have to find when f(x)=L+epsilon and find when f(x)=L-epsilon and then get the x from there that is closest to your c (then number x is approaching) Then take that c and evaluate |x-c| to find the largest possible delta
could be wrong though
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!