Ask your own question, for FREE!
History 9 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

medal and fan

OpenStudy (anonymous):

How does the Fourth Amendment help protect citizens of the United States? It provides citizens with the right to a speedy and public trial before a jury of their peers. It prohibits the government from interrogating citizens with torture or imposing cruel punishments. It allows citizens to share communications in public places without the threat of arrest. It prevents the government from holding or searching citizens without authorization from a judge. Question 2 (Multiple Choice Worth 4 points) (Active Citizens LO 5 MC) Which of the following represents a benefit of the Second Amendment to citizens of the United States? It allows citizens to organize into groups for peaceful protests. It frees communities from crime. It helps citizens provide a defense against foreign invaders. It provides for every citizen to have a trial by jury. Question 3 (Multiple Choice Worth 4 points) (Active Citizens LO 6 MC) Taylor, a 7th grader at Juno Middle School, loves whales. She believes it is her duty to understand all laws and regulations that apply to the whaling industry and how this will affect the whales. Taylor would be considered a watchdog representative interest group member of the media Question 4 (Multiple Choice Worth 4 points) (Active Citizens LO 6 MC) Which of the following best explains why a Senator might wish to have a press conference to explain a recent vote in Congress that might upset people? To focus on upcoming legislation that more people like To address the concerns of a majority of voters before voters become displeased To appear confident in a decision despite the criticism of a few To make sure voters know that the decision was not the Senator's but the party's Question 5 (Multiple Choice Worth 4 points) (Active Citizens LO 5 MC) In the 1983 case of Hazelwood v. Kulhmeier, did the Supreme Court agree or disagree with the principal and why? The Supreme Court agreed with the principal stating educational administrators had the right to censor material that was deemed contrary to the school's educational mission. The Supreme Court disagreed with the principal stating that newspaper editors could print students' stories and opinions without censorship as long as the material was not profane. The Supreme Court disagreed with the principal citing Tinker v. Des Moines and stated the principal had violated the students' First Amendment rights of freedom of speech. The Supreme Court agreed with the principal but said the article could be published in the school newspaper as long as the father's response was also included in the article.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@arabpride @geerky42

OpenStudy (litening1337):

1. D 2. C 3. D (My guess) 4. B (My guess) 5. C (IDK this one)

geerky42 (geerky42):

Why you tagged me? I don't know history.

OpenStudy (redeemed1312):

Lol what do you think the answers are?

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!