Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 17 Online
OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

Find an ex. of a bdd disc. fn. \[f:[0,1]\rightarrow R\] that has neither an absolute min. nor an absolute max.

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

@zzr0ck3r

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

So my issue is, even a horizontal line achieves an absolute max and min, would it have to be a vertical asymptote?

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

bdd ?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

bounded sorry

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

see the vertical asymptote doesn't allow for bounded

OpenStudy (zzr0ck3r):

sorry my new computer is hating this site, I got to install chrome and then ill be back.

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

it's ok, the site is muffed up currently

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So you need a bounded discontinuous function that doesn't have an absolute min or an absolute max?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

yea, but none exists

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Since your function needs to be discontinuous, you might be able to be creative and pull it off.

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

I mean, it needs to have a domain of [0,1] the only thing I can think of is something that is disc at 0 and 1 but I don't have an ex of that

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

like needs to hit infinity

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

unlessss Tangent? a modification on it?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Something like:\[f(x)=x \text{ if x is irrational,}0\text{ if x is rational }\]

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

but that achieves it's min and max

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

at the irrational before 1 right?

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

imn would be 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ah, it achieves its min. It doesnt achieve its max.

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

it has to be both

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Then change the value at x=0 to something else. like 1/2. This is a discontinuous function. It can be defined however you want.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ah, its still not right. I see what you are saying.

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

so to get rid of the min that would work because the zeroes would be near zero and the ones would be near one... wow, i can't believe I didn''t think of that

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

but 0 and 1 are rational.... I still think it may work

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I guess change the value at the rationals? make it, f(x)= x if x is irrational, f(x)=1/2 if x is rational

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

yea, I think that is what I'll do

OpenStudy (fibonaccichick666):

thanks!

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!