Stuck on very last part of these 2 questions!
any thoughts ?
\[y=\cos(m \arcsin(x))\] \[\text{ Let } u=m \arcsin(x) \\ \frac{u}{m}=\arcsin(x) \\ \sin(\frac{u}{m})=x \\ \cos(\frac{u}{m}) \frac{du}{m}=dx \\ \frac{1}{m}\cos(\frac{u}{m})=\frac{dx}{du} \\ u_1=\frac{du}{dx}=m \sec(\frac{u}{m}) \\ \text{ so anyways } \\ y=\cos(u) \\ y_1=-\sin(u) u_1 \\ y_2=-\sin(u) u_2 -\cos(u) u_1 u_1=-\sin(u) u_2-\cos(u)u_1^2\] \[y_3=-\cos(u)u_2u_1-\sin(u)u_3+\sin(u)u_1u_1^2-2\cos(u)u_1u_2 \\ y_3=-\cos(u)u_2u_1-2\cos(u)u_1u_2-\sin(u)u_3+\sin(u)u_1^3 \\ y_3=-3\cos(u)u_2u_1-\sin(u)[u_3-u^3_1]\] \[y_4=-3[-\sin(u)u_1u_2u_1+\cos(u)u_3u_1+\cos(u)u_2u_2] \\- \cos(u)u_1[u_3-u_1^3]-\sin(u)[u_4-3u_1^2u_2]\] \[y_4=-3\cos(u)u_3u_1-3\cos(u)u_2^2-\cos(u)u_1u_3+\cos(u)u_1^4\\ -\sin(u)u_4+3\sin(u)u_1^2u_2+3\sin(u)u_1^2u_2 \] \[y_4=-4\cos(u)u_3u_1-3\cos(u)u_2^2+\cos(u)u_1^4-\sin(u)u_4+4\sin(u)u_1^2u_2 \] \[y_4=\cos(u)[-4u_3u_1-3u_2^2+u^4_1]-\sin(u)[u_4-4u^2_1u_2] \] ....I was trying to find y_n this way but I do not see a pattern
once i found y_n i was going to but it back in terms of x instead of u
i see mention of lebnitz theorem i either do not recall that theorem or remember
i need to use it... (saw similar other questions using it) let me pull out that theorem ...
at least i can still recall my cal 1 skills lol
yeah, i thought i made some mistake in finding 2nd derivative and got one sqrt (1-x^2) extra...but could not find the error....if there's no error in y_2 then, lebnitz also is not giving the required result
i guess induction would not work i haven't tried it
and i don't know at this point if it sounds dumb or not to you but i might look at it
\( (1-x^2 ) y_2-xy_1+\dfrac{(m^2 y)}{√((1-x^2 ) )}=0\) got this if only i would have got \( (1-x^2 ) y_2-xy_1+ m^2 y =0 \) then i would have got the required result
is my quotient rule correct ?
i guess i just missed the sqrt (1-x^2) in the numerator...!?
i have
but i should have
\[(1-x^2) y^2 \\ =-(1-x^2) \cdot \frac{[xmsin(m \arcsin(x))+\sqrt{1-x^2}m^2\cos(m \arcsin(x))]}{1-x^2} \\ =-[xmsin(m \arcsin(x))+\sqrt{1-x^2}m^2\cos(m \arcsin(x))] \]
yeah! thats it...i didn't apply quotient rule properly! :P and wasted both of our time :O *shame on me* please go through next question now....
\[(1-x^2) y_2 \\ =-(1-x^2) \cdot \frac{[xmsin(m \arcsin(x))+\sqrt{1-x^2}m^2\cos(m \arcsin(x))]}{1-x^2} \\ =-[xmsin(m \arcsin(x))+\sqrt{1-x^2}m^2\cos(m \arcsin(x))] \] \[ -xy_1 \\ =x \cdot \frac{m \sin(m \arcsin(x))}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}\]
stupid question for next question what is the objective
i proved, using that theorem, that the value of that big expression is \(n^2 u\) but that is for homogeneous equation of the order n i have \(u=e^{(x+y)}+\log (x^3+y^3-x^2 y-xy^2)\) how will i prove that it is homogeneous with order 3 if its is that
it might not be a big deal to you but i see something i don't like with your rewriting of u in your word document you probably already caught it but it was the last line in the text you put here \[e^{x+y}=e^{\frac{1}{x}(1+\frac{y}{x})} \neq e^\frac{1}{x} \cdot e^{1+\frac{y}{x}}=e^{\frac{1}{x}+1+\frac{y}{x}}=e^\frac{1+x+y}{x}\]
oops and i messed up to lol
oops, i thought \(a^{mn} = a^m a^n \)
\[e^{x+y}=e^{x(1+\frac{y}{x})}\]
\[a^m \cdot a^n=a^{m+n} \text{ and } (a^m)^n=(a^n)^m=a^{nm}\]
right got that mistake but how to show that its homogeneous, if it is...
i was able to follow everything above that but until we got u=e^whatever+log(stuff) was this u given to you or did you find this u from your solving
given in the question
ok great i was like @hartnn is so smart
I wonder if @tkhunny would know I need to do a little more reading I think
so my main doubt is \(u=e^{(x+y)}+\log (x^3+y^3-x^2 y-xy^2)\) how would i prove that it is homogeneous equation of order 3 if it is that
"A partial differential equation is an equation that involves an unknown function and its partial derivatives. The order of the highest derivative defines the order of the equation. The equation is called linear if the unknown function only appears in a linear form. Finally, the equation is homogeneous if every term involves the unknown function or its partial derivatives and inhomogeneous if it does not. "
I copied this it says every term involves the unknown function or its partial derivatives
Leibnitz requires FINITE derivatives?
that question is solved.... please look through the next one!
unknown functions here are log and exponential ? and since they are linear u is homogeneous ?
I copied that from this link http://www-solar.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/~alan/MT2003/PDE/node10.html I
that says \(\ln (x^2+y^2)\) is homogeneous, right ? but with what order ? 2 ?
i have the theorem, i have the function just don't know how to apply it as i need to prove that u is homogeneous first and want to confirm that the order is 3 so that final answer becomes 9u...
let me ask that as a separate question....
Have you considered factoring the argument of the logarithm, creating a much simpler expression whose partial derivatives fail to be particularly creative?
2 ln (x-y) + ln (x+y)
how does that help ?
If it's 3rd order, with two independent variables x, and y, we shouldn't get TOO many variations of partial derivatives. Those simpler expressions seemed at least a little promising.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!