The position of a particle at time t is s(t)=(t^3) +t . How do I ESTIMATE the instantaneous velocity at t=1 without using a calculator?
Well what do you know about the relationship[ between position and velocity?
velocity is the derivative of the position?
yes so you find s'(t) = v(t) thgen evaluate v(t) at t=1 so v(1) = ?
oh, i'm not supposed to find the derivative because my teacher wants us to use: as the limit approaches...
i mean, both methods are finding the derivative, but i'm not supposed to "know the easy way (your way)" yet
ah so she wants you to use the definition of the derivative meaning.... \[f'(x) = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{ f(x+h) - f(x) }{ h }\]
yes, like that, except for the minor change of changing the 'f' to 's' and 'h' to 't'
well x becomes t but f does become s yes so
if i want the instantanoues velocity at t=1, should i write as t ->0 or as t->1 under 'lim'?
nah the h stays the x is what becomes the t
so this is what you are after \[v(t) = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0}\frac{ s(t+h) - s(t) }{ h }\]
what does the 'h' refer to?
it is basically the change in the variable so some textbooks refer to the h as this.... \[f'(x) = \lim_{\Delta x \rightarrow 0} \frac{ f(x+\Delta x )-f(x)}{ \Delta x }\]
so it's always delta (variable) ->0 and not approaching another value, like 1?
\[ v(1) = \lim_{\Delta t \rightarrow 0}\frac{ s(1+\Delta t) - s(1) }{ \Delta t } \]
no it approaches 0 because if you were to use the formula the 0 makes all the change in disappear and you are left with a formula that you can plug your value in or you can shortcut it the way aum has by putting the 1 in right way
um what do i do if i want an estimate of v(1)?
sorry
your estimate is when you plug the value in. If it is asking for a estimate without putting a value in you can't really to be honest
\[ v(1) = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0}\frac{ s(1+h) - s(1) }{ h } = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0}\frac{ (1+h)^3 + (1+h) - (1^3 + 1) }{ h } = ? \]
yea that will be your answer
\( (1+h)^3 = 1 + 3h + 3h^2 + h^3\)
in the end i got 4+4h. is that correct?
make the h become 0 you get 4
\[ v(1) = \lim_{h \rightarrow 0} 4 + 4h = 4\]
oh yeah! i forgot to plug in the 0! and the 4 here is the same as 4 i would have gotten if i used the shorter method, i.e. 3t squared + 1
Yes. v(t) = 3t^2 + 1 v(1) = 3 + 1 = 4
So yours is not really an estimate but an accurate value done through limits instead of using derivatives formula.
As I said i wouldn't know how to do it as an estimate
my textbook says "To estimate the instantaneous rate of change at x = x0, compute the average rate of change over several intervals[x0,x1](or[x1,x0]) for x1 close to x0. "
ah they want you to do that?
In that case, v(1) = ( s(2) - s(0) ) / ( 2 - 0 )
and to find the estimated instantaenous velocity, "compute the average rate for several intervals lying to the left and right of" t=1
hilbert, i think so - but i would need a calculator for the decimals (like t=1.0001 and t= .9999), but the teacher says i can't use a calculator
I find this question flawed to be honest
\[ v(1) \approx \frac { s(2) - s(0) }{ 2 - 0 } = \frac{2^3 + 2 - 0^3 - 0}{2-0} = \frac{10}{2} = 5 \]
aum, i'm curious about why it's s(2)?
he is taking a number to the right of 1
one unit to the left of t = 1 and one unit to the right of t = 1 t = 0 and t = 2
To get a better estimate we can go 0.5 on either side but you have to calculate (0.5)^3 and (1.5)^3 if you want to do that.
i see. but yea, id rather use whole numbers since i'm not allowed to use a calculator
Actually 0.1 on either side may not be that hard to do.
should there be another equation of v(1) in addition to the one you posted earlier, aum?
oh
\[ v(1) \approx \frac { s(1.1) - s(0.9) }{ 1.1 - 0.9 } = \frac { 1.1^3 + 1.1 - 0.9^3 - 0.9 }{ 0.2} = \\ \text{ } \\ \frac { 1.331 + 1.1 - 0.729 - 0.9 }{ 0.2} = \frac{0.802}{0.2} = \frac{0.802}{0.2} * \frac{5}{5} = \frac{4.01}{1} = 4.01 \]
thank you to both; you taught me stuff i didn't know
You are welcome.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!