2a +3ba^2 + 2ab^2 +b^3 how can I get (a+b) (2a^2 +ab + b^2)?
you seem to be missing something
what am I missing?
well, your factored form has 2a^3, but you have no 2a^3 to start with
it has 2a^2
a*2a^2 = 2a^3 which isnt in your starting stuff
thats because its factorized. If I combine the factors I get above but I am not sure how to get to the factor part
im saying, when you combine your factors, you get 2a^3 ... you have no 2a^3 to start with so one doesnt form into the other
you are missing something
ooo sorry my bad, it suppose to be 2a^3 the 2a
if factor by grouping is your cup o tea, then we want to split it into 6 terms, but grouping is not what im good at
I'm trying to do that but I am not getting the same as the factor
im att a(2a^2+2b^2) + b(3a^2 + b^2) which is near close to the factor
2a^3 +3ba^2 + 2ab^2 +b^3 2a^3 +(2ba^2 + ba^2) + (i ab^2+j ab^2) +b^3 (2a^3 +2ba^2 + i ab^2) + (ba^2+j ab^2 +b^3) a(2a^2 +2ba + i b^2) + b(a^2+j ab +b^2) i loathe by grouping ....
2a^3 +3ba^2 + 2ab^2 +b^3 2a^3 +(x ba^2 + y ba^2) + (i ab^2 +j ab^2) +b^3 (2a^3 +x ba^2+ i ab^2) + (y ba^2 +j ab^2 +b^3) a(2a^2 +x ba+ i b^2) + b(y a^2 +j ab +b^2) y = 2 i = 1 x = j x+y = 3, x = 1 i + j = 2, j = 1
but but I don't see (a+b)(2a^2+ab+b^2) =.= my goal is to just reach that factor
since the left and right terms need to be the same, we can solve for how we need to split them
without knowing how to split it, i just used xyij as placeholders to get to: a(2a^2 +x ba+ i b^2) + b(y a^2 +j ab +b^2) now: 2a^2 +x ba+ i b^2 = y a^2 +j ab + b^2 y=2 x=j i=1 , this is the only way itll work for us x+y = 3, and i+j = 2 x+2 = 3, and 1+j = 2 x=1 j=1
soo, let fill those in: 2a^3 +3ba^2 + 2ab^2 +b^3 2a^3 +(1 ba^2 + 2 ba^2) + (1 ab^2 +1 ab^2) +b^3 (2a^3 +ba^2+ ab^2) + (2ba^2 +ab^2 +b^3) a(2a^2 +ba+ b^2) + b(2a^2 +ab +b^2) (a+b) (2a^2 +ba+ b^2) , as required
\[2a^3+3ba^2+2ab^2+b^3\] Which methods would you use to factor this? the easiest (I might of picked the hardest lol)
your pick was fine, otherwise theres a few trial and errors to mess with
what about one where I don't have to deal with other terms?
got an example?
or a method that doesnt deal with new terms ...
like as how you used x j i y etc
if we assume (a+b) is a factor, which at first glance it may not be, then division finds the other factor
2a^2 + ab + b^2 --------------------------- a+b | 2a^3 +3ba^2 + 2ab^2 +b^3 -(2a^3 +2ba^2) ------------ ba^2 +2ab^2 -(a^2b + ab^2) ------------- ab^2 + b^3 -(ab^2 + b^3) ------------ 0
but there is not way to know if a+b is a factor to start with
well, there is, let b=-a if it zeros out then (a+b) is a factor
2a^3 +3(-a)a^2 + 2a(-a)^2 +(-a)^3 2a^3 -3a^3 + 2a^3 - a^3 = 4-4 = 0
so (a+b) is a factor
this is way easier than the first part, thanks you.
wait how did you start with b = -a?
at this point, there is no 'easier' way to me
well, if (a+b) is a factor: then f(x) = (a+b)(whatever) is our factorization when (a+b) = 0, then the original f(x) will have to equal 0 a+b = 0 when b=-a, or when a=-b doesnt matter
knowing that it is a factor, we can do the division to find the (whatever) part
ooo ok so I can know if those are factors of the function if they are equals to 0
this would only be easy if we had terms such as a and b right?
maybe
ok, I think I got the hang of it. thanks
good luck :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!