Prove using mathematical induction that 1^3+2^3+...+n^3=(n^2(n+1)^2)/4
You must do it for base case first.
Then after that: \[\text{ Assume } 1^3+2^3+ \cdots +k^3=\frac{k^2(k+1)^2}{4} \text{ holds for some integer } \\ k>0\] \[\text{ And show } 1^3+2^3+\cdots +(k+1)^3 =\frac{(k+1)^2(k+2)^2}{4} \text{ holds }\]
hint: \[1^3+2^3+\cdots +(k+1)^3 \\ =1^3+2^3+ \cdots +k^3 +(k+1)^3 \\ =\frac{k^2(k+1)^2}{4}+(k+1)^3 \]
you must use algebra to show that equals (k+1)^2(k+2)^2/4
david do not make it harder than it needs to be do not multiply all of that out
Let me know when and if you need a hint
I just don't understand when I reached Part Three of Induction Proofs "Prove true for k+1"
You are saying you don't understand what it means?
I do. I just don't know how to get the final answer.
Oh first step take your second term and multiply it by 4/4
\[=\frac{k^2(k+1)^2}{4}+\frac{4(k+1)^3}{4}\]
Doing this will allow us to write as one fraction
\[=\frac{k^2(k+1)^2+4(k+1)^3}{4}\]
See. That is what I don't understand.
the combining fractions part?
How about the first part \[1^3+2^3+...+n^3=\]
How does this work out?
Are we talking about the base case? showing it is true for n=1?
Step 1: Show it is true for the base case. The base case for this one is showing it is true for n=1: \[1^3 =1 =\frac{1^2(1+1)^2}{4} \text{ holds } \]
Base case? I don't think so. What I mean is how does it expand? For example:\[1+2+3+...+k= \] becomes \[1+2+3+k+ k+1\] This is what I mean. How does \[1^3+2^3+...+n^3 \] become "expanded"??
\[\text{ Assume } 1^3+2^3+ \cdots +k^3=\frac{k^2(k+1)^2}{4} \text{ holds for some integer } \\ k>0 \text{ And show } 1^3+2^3+\cdots +(k+1)^3 =\frac{(k+1)^2(k+2)^2}{4} \text{ holds }\] That thing I assumed is true (first line of this post) is an equation I found just from replacing n with k The thing we want to show using the thing we assume is true is an equation I found from just replacing the n's with (k+1)'s
@amistre64 or @hero
I'm calling others here because I don't understand. I'm sorry.
I don't understand either. I hate Mathematical Inductions.
Like I mean I don't understand your question is all.
proof by induction is all about form .... since know a certain form is true we must manipulate the k+1th element into the 'true form'
Like this: \[1+2+3+...=\frac{ n(n+1) }{ 2 }\] \[1+2+3+...+k+k+1= \frac{ (k+1)(k+1+1) }{ 2 }\]\[\frac{ k(k+1) }{ 2} + k+1 = \frac{ (k+1)(k+2) }{ 2 }\] \[\frac{ k(k+1)+2(k+1) }{ 2 } = \frac{ (k+1)(k+2) }{ 2}\] See how it's "expanding" after the first line Freckles???
after the basis step, which proves its true for a specific value, we want to make it general again ... let n=k 1^3+2^3+...+k^3 = (k^2(k+1)^2)/4 <= it is this FORM that we know is good if we let the left side be named, say P(k) then P(k) = (k^2(k+1)^2)/4 add then k+1th term to each side .. P(k) + (k+1)^3 = (k^2(k+1)^2)/4 + (k+1) now the leftside is just the P(k+1) term, and we can focus on the right side manipulating it into the 'good' form to show that k has turned into k+1
forgot my ^3 on the right side :)
Ok. I kind of starting to get it.
maybe if I do an example for you or something... Let's show \[1^2+2^2+3^2 + \cdots + n^2=\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6} \] The first case is showing it is true for the base case. The base case being for n=1 in this case So we have \[1^2 \text{ on left hand side } \text{ and } \frac{1(1+1)(2(1)+1)}{6}=\frac{1(2)(3)}{6} \\ \text{ both sides are equal to 1 } \text{ this shows the base case }\] Now we have an if then statement \[\text{ If } 1^2+2^2+\cdots + k^2=\frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6} \\ \text{ for some integer } k \ge 1 \text{ , then } \\ 1^2+2^2+\cdots +(k+1)^2=\frac{(k+1)(k+2)(2(k+1)+1)}{6} \text{ holds }\] So in if then statements we get to suppose the if part and show the then part... \[1^2+2^2+\cdots +(k+1)^2 \\ \text{ we know k comes before (k+1) } \\ \text{ so we can write } \\ 1^2+2^2+ \cdots +k^2+(k+1)^2 \\ \text{ but by our induction hypothesis we can write } 1^2+2^2+ \cdots + k^2 \\ \text{ as } \frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6} \\ \text{ so we have } 1^2+2^2 + \cdots +k^2+ (k+1)^2 \text{ can be written as } \\ \frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6} +(k+1)^2 \\ \text{ Remember we are trying to show this is equal to the one fraction } \\ \frac{(k+1)(2k+1)(2k+3)}{6} \\ \text{ so let's look at } \\ \frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6} +(k+1)^2 \text{ and think ... } \\ \text{ well we need one fraction so ... let's combine fractions } \\ \frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}{6} +\frac{6(k+1)^2}{6} \\ \frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)+6(k+1)^2}{6} \\ \text{ now do some factoring } \frac{(k+1)[k(2k+1)+6(k+1)}{6} \\ \frac{(k+1)[2k^2+k+6k+6]}{6} \\ \frac{(k+1)(2k^2+7k+6)}{6} \\ \frac{(k+1)(2k^2+3k+4k+6)}{6} \\ \frac{(k+1)[k(2k+3)+2(2k+3)]}{6} \\ \frac{(k+1)(2k+3)(k+2)}{6} \\ \text{ which is what we wanted to show } \\ \text{ so therefore we can conclude } \\ 1^2+2^2+\cdots +n^2=\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6} \text{ holds for all integer } n \ge 1. \]
the thing is, if we knows it true for some k (we know its true for the base case) and can show by 'form' that the (k+1)th term fits the same format, then we have shown that if we simply replace k with k+1 that the setup remains consistent ... nothing is altered, and therefore we can say its true for the next term, and the next term, and the next ..
term being defined as an integer that is
1+2+3+...+k doesn't become 1+2+3+...+k+(k+1)
it does if you add the next term :) but other than that its immaterial what the left side looks like
saying 1+2+3+...+k becomes 1+2+3+...+k+(k+1) feels like someone is saying these are equal so I just didn't like the word becomes
The statement is P(n) and we want to show P(n) is true for all positive integer n So show P(1) is true assume P(k) is true show P(k+1) is true
'becomes' has a connotation of change, of morphing, of changing by default ... not equality or sameness.
tomato tomato tho lol
Ok ok like the spice girls say 2 becomes 1
2 becomes 1 by subtracting 1 from 2
or there some other ways 2 can become 1
But I don't know if I should rely on Spice Girls for my mathematical meanings
she becomes pregnant infers something has changed :)
david, any thoughts brewing?
Well my math teacher taught us that k becomes k+k+1
Why must Mathematical Inductions be taught anyways?? I don't see it being useful in life anyways.
Well I know it is useful in some computer science-y things and it definitely useful for proving things... It also exercises your algebra skills.
Or so I heard it is useful in computer science
I'm more into Biology, that's why.
This says why it is useful in computer science But I have no clue how it will help you in bio
Besides to help strengthen those critical thinking skills and algebra skills
Exactly. This proves my point why I don't find this useful at all. I suck in math.
I think there is math in bio if I'm not mistaken
I definitely know statistics is important to every science
There is math in bio but it's not the hard type of math, just some hard math now and then. But never have I seen mathematical inductions being used in bio
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!