Question

Which statement describes a problem with the peer review process in scientific research?
It can sometimes reject important new ideas or novel techniques.
It forces new scientists to meet the same standards that established scientists meet.
It always requires scientists to have to reanalyze their data.
It often makes it more difficult to justify a conclusion.

Answer 1

sorry, i was busy combing my hero hair

Answer 2

It always requires scientists to have to reanalyze their data. is true but is good not bad

Answer 3

It often makes it more difficult to justify a conclusion. is false so no

Answer 4

It can sometimes reject important new ideas or novel techniques. this should not be the case it should be unbiased

Answer 5

It forces new scientists to meet the same standards that established scientists meet. this is a problem because it demands conformism and stringency which subtracts from originality and ingenuity

Answer 6

@arabpride lol that should be a famous quote xD

Answer 7

@Tootles143

Answer 8

I am here.

Answer 9

The scientific evidence that scientists use in supporting or critiquing the conclusions of experiments usually consists of
raw data.
outlier data.
precise data.
summarized data.

Answer 10

thank u @PRAETORIAN.10

Answer 11

I want to say raw. But hold on right quick.

Answer 12

"Raw data can be input to a computer program or used in manual procedures such as analyzing statistics from a survey. The term can refer to the binary data on electronic storage devices such as hard disk drives (also referred to as low-level data)."

Answer 13

ok

Answer 14

so the answer is A?

Answer 15

Raw data
Raw data (also known as primary data) is a term for data collected from a source. Raw data has not been subjected to processing or any other manipulation, and are also referred to as primary data. Yeah i think its that one.

Answer 16

thank u @PRAETORIAN.10 and thanks @Tootles143

Answer 17

I think its b.

Answer 18

Anytime.

Answer 19

Your welcome

Answer 20

ok i'll go with b

Answer 21

yeah b was right

Answer 22

Ha. (Chanting) I got it right, I got it right!!!!!

Answer 23

hahahha

Answer 24

can u help me i have a test now >_<

Answer 25

Yeah!!!! Of course. I told you i was......... :D

Answer 26

hahaha ok

Answer 27

Two scientists wrote a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submitted it to a scientific journal. Several months later, they received the paper back from the publisher with many comments attached from several fellow scientists. What is most likely the next step taken by the authors of the paper?
They will change their research to a different topic and start all over again.
They will alter the data to match the results that their peers were expecting.
They will incorporate the suggestions from their peers and resubmit the paper.
They will sue the journal for not printing the paper and delaying their research.

Answer 28

Its C.

Answer 29

Mendel made conclusions about inheritance without ever seeing chromosomes or knowing about DNA. Which technology has enabled the greatest advances in understanding inheritance?
DNA structure
DNA analysis
light microscopy
electron microscopy

Answer 30

i think b right?

Answer 31

B. Your CORRECT!! loL

Answer 32

Which part of a scientific argument must be supported by valid data?
claim
evidence
reasoning
theory

Answer 33

is it b?

Answer 34

Actually it is A.............. :)

Answer 35

Scientific evidence is most likely to be consistent if it is based on data from
random samples.
uncontrolled experiments.
biased experimental designs.
small data samples.

Answer 36

well it depends really. it will FOR SURE be identical if it is biased. because thats the point of the bias. but if the data samples are small enough they will mostly be identical too

Answer 37

I think it is the last one.....................

Answer 38

Typical methods of classroom scientific communication include
scientific journal articles, oral presentations, and Internet collaboration.
lectures, lab reports, term papers, and poster presentations.
scientific journal articles, professional organizations, and conferences.
lectures, conferences, term papers, and technical journals.

Answer 39

What is the question?

Answer 40

Typical methods of classroom scientific communication include

Answer 41

Sorry i am a little confused................ :/ #CONFUSED

Answer 42

ok let's skip it

Answer 43

same sample and recorded the following data: 30 g, 31 g, 29 g, and 30 g. All students used the same balance during the same class period. Dawn’s data are most likely inconsistent due to
human error.
biased procedures.
broken instruments.
accurate measurement.

Answer 44

i got this one it's A right?

Answer 45

Where is the question...................sorry.

Answer 46

it's ok i got this one

Answer 47

Which is an example of scientific evidence that can be used to critique a new scientific argument?
data that were collected from related historical experiments
data that have been analyzed to remove an outlier
data that incorporate the opinions of leading scientists
data that were collected from a single successful experiment

Answer 48

Which one do you think it is?

Answer 49

c or d

Answer 50

C.

Answer 51

Cory recorded the following values when he measured the length of leaves from one tree.

Length in centimeters: 10, 13, 11, 12, 12, 11, 8
What is the mean of Cory’s data?
8 cm
10 cm
11 cm
13 cm

Answer 52

is it 11?

Answer 53

I think a little smaller.............

Answer 54

i know 10 is wrong so which one do u think

Answer 55

So than your right because 8 is samller than 10

Answer 56

Is there any other questions?

Answer 57

yes sorry my laptop just shouted down

Answer 58

Thats alright np

Answer 59

Which source is considered a primary source of scientific information?
an original research article in a scientific journal
a report about a new scientific discovery in the newspaper
a book that compiles important new research findings
a public lecture at a museum given by the scientist who did the research

Answer 60

What do you think it is.................?

Answer 61

idk this one

Answer 62

is it d?

Answer 63

I think so too.

Answer 64

the last question

Answer 65

A scientific argument will be considered invalid if the evidence supporting that argument is based on
inconsistent data.
independent data.
unlimited results.
controlled results.

Answer 66

iNDEPENDENT DATA OR INCONSISTENT DATA?

Answer 67

WOOPS CAPS..........

Answer 68

:( im re taking it cuz when my shouted down 5 questions locked

Answer 69

my laptop **

Answer 70

Okay.............

Answer 71

thanks for helping im going to do my hw then im going to sleep good night

Answer 72

tootle dude did most of the work cause im stuck in my lab but yeah no probs :D

Answer 73

Your Welcome!! :D