Doubt in convergence of sum of different series
The question is : What is the range of values of x for which : \[\large{\sum{(a + b + c)}}\] is convergent.
a, b and c are some series... Now, I solved this question in following way. 1. I proved that series b is convergent for all values of x. 2. Then, I said that for the sum to be convergent, series (a+c) must also be convergent
so the sum an + bn + cn
3. Then using power series formula, I evaluated the set of those values of x. Now, my answer matches with the correct answer. But, my teacher says that I am wrong.
the radius of convergence will be the intersection of the radii of convergence of an, bn, and cn.
@perl no no... a, b and c are not constants. They are some functions in terms of x. For saving time, I have not mentioned the exact functions.
@perl exactly!!! That is what I did, but my teacher says I am wrong. I would like to know your views on this
are the series, an, bn, and cn given?
yes
i would need to see them
Does your teacher give a reason why you're wrong, maybe you should talk with your teacher and it's just a simple mistake.
Perhaps some step in your proof is incorrect, even though you ended up at the correct answer your argument was flawed.
I know if I was an algebra teacher and someone said \[\LARGE 3^2*3^2=3^{2*2}=81\] I would say they were wrong lol.
Hi @Kainui , I asked my instructor and he said that you can't do this.... when I asked what is wrong with this, he just repeats himself and says, it is not the correct way of solving questions... That is why, I would like to know what is wrong with my method... In fact, in thomas calculus, a question was solved using this approach... :D This question has 18 credit points, those who only wrote correct answer (i.e. the correct range got 2) but after complete explanation and correct answer, I got zero ;) I gave it for rechecking and still the same marks... It is not that I want marks. Its just that I want an explanation for why this approach is wrong
@perl, sure... Give me a few minutes please
The only explanation that seems to make sense to me is that you are smarter than your teacher.
:D If I say this to him... he is going to kill me ;)
Hahaha I am only telling you so that you don't kill yourself trying to reason out why you are wrong when you are perfectly right.
Okay here is the exact question: Find the positive values of x for which the following series converges: \[\large{\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}[\cfrac{x^{3n-2}}{(3n-2)!} + \cfrac{1}{(3n-1)^{x+1}} + x^{3n}}]\]
First, I proved that \(\large{\cfrac{1}{(3n-1)^{x+1}}}\) converges for all positive values of x. Then, I mentioned that sum of rest two terms must also converge for the whole sum to be convergent
I think the third term there only converges for x^3<1 since it's a geometric series.
The first term converges for all x since it's only every third term of the power series for e^x which already converges, so taking away some of the terms of that will only make it converge to smaller numbers. Just throwing out facts and ideas to help, keep explaining what you did though and I'll see what I can do.
For convergence of first and third terms, \[\large \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}|{\cfrac{{u_{n+1}}}{u_{n}}| < 1}\]
Even though this isn't the limit as you get infinitely larger, if you did pick x=2 and looked at the first two terms of the summation, n=1 and n=2 \[\LARGE \left| \frac{2^6}{2^3} \right| \ge1\] So you know that is false.
\[\large{\implies \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} |\cfrac{x^{3n+3} + \cfrac{x^{3n+1}}{(3n+1)!}}{x^{3n} + \cfrac{x^{3n-2}}{(3n-2)!}}| < 1}\] \[\large{\implies\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} |x^3\cfrac{x^2 + \cfrac{1}{(3n+1)!}}{x^2 + \cfrac{1}{(3n-2)!}}| < 1}\] \[\large{\implies\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} |x^3| < 1}\] \[\large{\implies \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} |x| < 1}\] \[\large{\implies -1 < x < 1}\] Since, x is positive, thus: \[\large{0<x<1}\]
@Kainui , we are given that series is convergent, so we will have assume that it is less than 1 and using which we can find out the correct set of values of x. And also x = 2 > 1, which will not satisfy the convergence condition (as you mentioned)
Sorry I thought earlier you said the radius of convergence was 2 that's why I wrote that.
Sorry about that :)
What do you think @Kainui and @perl ?
but x is not zero (it is given that x is positive)
oh nevermind, you wrote x > )
x > 0
:)
ok so we can concentrate on the first and third series
yeah
i would prove the first series converges separately, and the radius
and your teacher said the answer is wrong, that you gave? what was your answer
My final answer was the required values of x is (0,1) and this is the correct answer according to him also, but he says that your method is wrong. He doesn't explain why ...
well it seems because you need x > 0 in order that the middle series does not diverge. and you have |x | <1 because of the geometric series (for the third series).
so putting these two facts together, you get it converges on (0,1)
yes
he said that's wrong?
no he says that the answer is correct but the approach is wrong...
What do you think ?
well the sum of two converging series is converging
yep
I think you can find the interval of convergence for each series separately. then find the 'intersection' so the first series converges on (-oo,oo). second series converges on (0,oo) third series converges on (-1,1) so the intersection is (0,1) sorry, i dont know what else you could do .
and since each other series converges separately, the sum of the series converges
I agree that there are different methods of solving this question, but I just don't get what is wrong with my method ;) But still, thanks a lot for your response @perl and @Kainui
i would need more information from your teacher. maybe he didnt like how you tried to convergence of two series in one ?
it looks like you combined two series in one
you found the convergence of series 2 and series 3 , you did it one shot. i think you should do them separately
that could be a problem, if you have series that somehow cancel each other out
That may be the case... even then I will ask him again
What I am thinking if you can show that series an converges and series bn converges separately THEN series (an +bn) converges. This is a theorem (I checked). The converse may not be true
the converse may not be true generally
Yes you are correct on that. There are only 2 possibilities for the sum of 2 series to be convergent: 1. Both convergent 2. Both divergent
this is a sum of three series, not two series
Yes but I have transformed into sum of 2 series - 1. a+c 2. b
but you have to follow the theorem of a sum of series! the hypothesis says
I did not say that a and c must be convergent, I said that (a+c) must be convergent
im not sure if thats true
theorem: The sum of two converging sequences converges. (so you have to know the series are convergent seperately before you take the sum)
Correct. But, if you are given that sum of 2 series is convergent and one of the series is convergent, then other must also be convergent
Because if it is divergent, then, the sum will become divergent
yes, but are you given that in this problem?
yes
i didnt see that given
1. Find the positive values of x for which the following series converges: So, I have to assume that the whole sum must be convergent. 2. I proved that b is convergent. So, sum of 2 series (a+c) and b is convergent, b is convergent so (a+c) should be convergent
ok, checking
Though, it does not mean that a and c will be convergent but that is not necessary for the problem
sure :)
i wouldnt go about assuming the whole series converges. you can find that out as you do the problem. there may be no solution
But we have to find out the values of x for which the whole series converge.
right, and you can do that by finding the interval of convergence seperately for the three series.
Yes, that is also a possible approach
its possible there are no x values for which there is a solution. so thats kind of a big assumption.
My instructor agrees on this that we can assume that whole series is convergent because many students used this fact and then used ratio test to find out the values of x and he gave them full marks.
sorry, its possible that there is no x values for which the whole series is convergent
hmmm, then there could be another problem. i dont see it :)
I will ask my instructor again... :) Thanks again
let me look over your arithmetic, one sec
sure
i mean your algebra
bear with me
Sure :)
i have some issue with your algebra
in your limit
did you factor out x^(3n) ?
|dw:1414485264159:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!