67 x 53 x 63 x 6
vertical asymptotes occur generally in function where we attempt to divide by 0. Given that, when does your function do so, aka at what value of x?
5x^4?
hmmm well what value of x would make that term divide by 0?
5?
I mean 4
well if we make x = 4 in that term, we aren't dividing by 0 right? \[5x^{4}\]\[5(4)^{4}\]\[5(256)\]\[1280\] rather we should look at your second term in your function aka -7/x
what value of x would make -7/x divide by 0?
4?
ummm no. Do you understand what I mean by dividing by 0?
I don't think so
ah ok! So basically you want to find a value of x where it will make the denominator equal to 0. So if we have a function such as: \[y=\frac{4}{x-3}\] in order to make the denominator 0 we would simply make x = 3. Right? Since that would make the function look like this: \[y=\frac{4}{3-3}\]and 3-3 is 0 right so the function would become \[y=\frac{4}{0}\]and thus we are dividing by 0 and hence at x = 3, there is a vertical asymptote. Does this all make sense?
yes
ok so let's go back to your function of: \[y=5x^{4}-\frac{7}{x}+3\] but lets just look at the second term of your function. At what value of x would 7/x be dividing by 0?
3?
in other words how would we make: \[\frac{7}{x}\] into \[\frac{7}{0}\]
well putting 3 in as x (aka x=3) would make \[\frac{7}{x}\] into \[\frac{7}{3}\]
so that can't be right.
do you understand what I mean by "what value of x"?
wait what about 0?
or 1?
so if we make x = 0; \[\frac{7}{x}\] becomes \[\frac{7}{0}\] if we make x = 1; \[\frac{7}{x}\] becomes \[\frac{7}{1}\] so x =0 works! And so a vertical asymptote of f(x) =5x^4 - 7/x + 3 is x =0! But I have good feeling that you don't actually understand what you are doing. Am I wrong?
I think I just need to practice more
hmm ok but do you understand what I mean by me asking "what value of x"?
like exponent?
when I say what value of x, it simply means to put that number as x. Aka to substitute it as such. So everywhere there is an x you should instead put that value. So if the function is: \[f(x) = x^{2} +1\] and my value of x is 2 the function becomes like this \[f(2)=2^{2}+1\]Do you see how I replaced x with 2 everywhere in the function? does this make sense?
ohhhhh ok yes
could you help me with another problem?
so when I was asking for the value of x so that 7/x is dividing by 0, it makes full sense as to why x has to be 0 for that to happen right?
sure.
so do you know what it means by the left side of the graph?
not really
the left side of the graph is basically when x gets really really small and by "really really small" I mean really negative. So your question is essentially asking where does this function: \[f(x) = -x^{4}-x^{3}+4x-2\] go when x is really negative. Does this make sense?
yea
ok cool so let me say this before asking a question which seems to have little relevance: a function behavior is mainly dictated by the highest ordered term. By "ordered term" I mean the term with the highest x exponent. In this case the term would be: -x^4 since 4 is the highest exponent of x in the function. So my question is do you know what happens when you square a negative number?
no
ah ok so whenever you raise a negative number by a even exponent it becomes positive, so "squaring" or raising by 2 a negative number would make it positive...Does this make sense?
yes
ok good! So let's bring it back your function, so I said that we need to basically look at the highest ordered term of your function. What is the highest ordered term of your function(f(x) = - x^4 - x^3 + 4x - 2)?
4?
that's the order number, the actual term is -x^4. Terms are separated by + and -. Does this make sense?
ohokyea
cool! So now since we are looking for what happens when x is really negative right? But we are raising that really negative number by 4. So what happens when we raise a really negative number by 4?
It becomes...?
positive?
smaller?
It does become positive! But it becomes bigger! But since it has a negative sign in front of the term it actually becomes negative... So it become a really negative number. Does this make sense?
yes
you still there? lol
sorry I went to take a shower...ok good so we basically have our answer don't we? if the function tends to go to a really negative number. The direction is down right?
does that all make sense?
right because positive would go up?
I have one more question then I'll leave you alone lol
exactly because of how graph are drawn right where positive is up and negative is down and since at the left side, the function becomes really negative because x is really negative...the function's direction is down!
Lol. Don't worry about "leaving me alone" I enjoy helping people which is why I do this...this is the internet you know? if I really want to be left alone, I would simply shut off my computer lol.
Aw thanks:) lol I REALLY appreciate this.You really have been helping me understand this more.
so do you know what it means by relative extrema?
nope
so relative extrema aka local maximums are the peaks of the function so here a drawing:|dw:1414530008199:dw| in this drawing there are three relative extremas. Do you see the three peaks?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!