Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 13 Online
OpenStudy (coconutjj):

Given a rational function where the degree of the numerator is greater than the denominator. Find a hypothetical equation and list all the asymptotes. under the following conditions: (DO NOT WORK BACKWARDS) 1. The denominator is a quartic function and is not factorable 2. The numerator is a quadratic function and is not factorable

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

woops reverse numerator and denominator

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

numerator is quartic and denominator is quadratic

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

how?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Do you know the rules for asymptotes of rational functions?

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

yea

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh, I apologize, youre right.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Im thinking backwards :D But yeah, no asymptotes on that one.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\frac{ x^{4}+1 }{ x^{2}+1 }\] no asymptotes, my apologies.

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

hmm how would you be able to graph this without technology

OpenStudy (anonymous):

What class is this for?

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

Pre calc 12

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

i can find the oblique asymptote, but how would you know x asymptotes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

There are no asymptotes in this equation. An oblique asymptote requires the numerator to be exactly one degree higher than the denominator, but since it is 2 higher, we do not have an oblique. We can only have a horizontal asymptote if the degree of the numerator and denominator are the same or if the denominator is of a higher degee, so we do not have a horizontal asymptote. Vertical asymptotes can occur at x-values in which the denominator is equal to 0. But since we have x^2 + 1, there would only be complex solutions to x^2 + 1 = 0, so that means no vertical asymptotes either.

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

so there's a parabolic asymptote?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

There is no asymptote at all.

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

And then the next question is harder, it bumps the degree of the numerator and denominator both up by 1.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Were you still concerned about how we might graph it, or do you want to go to the next question?

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

I'm just needing help on both

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

It just clicked that i could use the quadratic equation

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

on the first one.. but how bout the second

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Let me clarify, are the two conditions above meant to be in the same equation or in separate equations?

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

\[\frac{ x^5+1 }{x^3+1 }\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Is the condition still needed that they cannot be factored?

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

yup

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Both of those can be factored, though.

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

im just giving an example of what i mean

OpenStudy (anonymous):

We have to do a little bit more work to make them not factorable. \[\frac{ x^{5} +2 }{ x^{3}+x+3 }\]Something like that should work.

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

hmm that works

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

but how would you find the asymptotes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well, there are no horizontal or oblique asymptotes. There is a vertical asymptote, but thats the tricky part, having a cubic that doesnt factor yet still has easy to find asymptotes. Anything that has nice numbers for vertical asymptotes will factor. So basically you're forced to have an equation with nasty asymptotes.

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

so you "force factor" x^3 +x +3 ??

OpenStudy (anonymous):

There is no force factoring. If there was, itd be factorable and would break the conditions of your question :) With the techniques you have available, youd have to approximate a solution. It'd just be tedious.

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

so there's no way you could find the exact asymptote

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

without tech

OpenStudy (anonymous):

There wouldnt be an exact asymptote, itd be some sort of irrational number. But you could get an answer very close with use of a basic calculator.

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

hmm

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Anything with an exact asymptote would be somethin that could be factorable. It might be a nasty factoring, but itd be factorable. If I have a vertical asymptote of, let's say, 2.35. Well, then all that means is that (x-2.35) is a factor. But we DONT want factors. So that forces you to have solutions that aren't nice and pretty. For this particular cubic I made up, the vertical asymptote would be approximately x = -1.2134. With precalculus techniques, you're using a primitive approximation method, but it could be done. With calculus, there's something called Newton's Method that could get you that answer in not too long with a basic calculator. But no matter what, since its a cubic equation, you're going to have at least one real asymptote, its just it has to be an irrational one in order to make sure its not factorable.

OpenStudy (coconutjj):

thank you

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You're welcome :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!