Ask your own question, for FREE!
Differential Equations 10 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Can't follow maths in my lectures whatsoever

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Alright, in the comments section, left-hand side, you should see an equation button. That's where you write it out.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[Y = e ^{\tan2x}\]

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Alright, cool. So are you trying to take the derivative of this, or what exactly do you want to do with it?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what's a derivative?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

we're doing like trig differentiation and derivatives but like I've no clue what's going on and idk what "e" or "ln" are...

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Alright, e is just a constant. It's a number, not a function, long story short, it doesn't matter for our purposes how or what it came from; it's a constant, and it's about 2.71 ln is very closely related to e. Natural log (ln) is something you can do to a number or variable, that puts that number in terms of e to some power, for instance,

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

\[\ln(e) = 1.\]What this means is that the argument of that natural log function, the e inside the parantheses, you are asking what power e is to. Since e inside the parentheses is to the first power, ln(e) = 1. On the other hand, \[\ln(e^2) = 2\]\[\ln(e^3)=3\]\[\ln(e^4)=4\]Make sense?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No? what's a parentheses?

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Parentheses are these: ( )

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

So it's just whatever inside the parentheses is what we'd call the "argument" of the natural log function. So the argument of \[\ln(25)\]is 25. The argument of \[\ln(x^2)\] is x^2.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Alright, so your function is \[y = e^{\tan(x)}\] In the same way that the argument of \[\ln(x)\] is x, the argument of \[\tan(x) \] in your problem is x; the thing inside the parentheses is your argument. So, let me ask something: What's the derivative of \[y = x^2\] with respect to x?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I don't know

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Alright, no worries. Do you know about the "limit definition of a derivative", or what a derivative comes from? This is the best place to start so everything makes sense in the longterm.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I did none of this at school

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Alright, site is back.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so \[\ln (e ^{2x}) = 2x\]

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Exactly, yup.

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Alright, so the derivative is a special kind of limit. Do you know what limits are?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[4\ln(5x+4) = 12.8 \] Use the law of logs to calculate for the value of x

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Alright, the first thing you can do is ______ across. What can you do with the four and the 12.8 on the other side to simplify things, first off?

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

divide both by 4?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

?

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Yup. Alright, then you have \[\ln(5x+4) = 3.2\] The question asks you to use the laws of logarithms to solve it, so from what you know about this problem, you can change things around like this: \[e^{3.2} = 5x+4\]This is called exponentiation. To exponentiate something is to put e to the power of (whatever you're exponentiating). e.g. If I said, "exponentiate the following equation",\[\ln(20) = x^2\]exponentiating it would result in \[e^{\ln(20)} = e^{x^{2}}\] In the same odd way that when you take the natural log of e, you get one, because what you're really asking when you say, "take the natural log of (argument)" is, "what power of e is the argument to?", when you put \[e^{\ln(x)}\]the e^ln disappears, and you're left with the argument of the natural log function.

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Does this make sense? \[e^{\ln(y)} = y\]\[e^{\ln(200)} = 200\]\[e^{\ln(2014)} = 2014\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Jesus he made is so much more complex than it actually is..

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Lmao.

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Alright, so recap, in this second problem, you started with\[4\ln(5x + 4) = 12.8\]The first thing we did was choose to divide through by four on both sides to get:\[\ln(5x+4) = 3.2\]Now, we've just exponentiated the whole equation, so we have:\[e^{\ln(5x+4)} = e^{3.2}, \ \ 5x+4 = e^{3.2}\]Now, you can solve for x as you might usually. Give it a shot.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

5x+4 = ln(e^3.2) ?

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Wait a moment, you'd have to do that to both sides. Kind of like multiplying or dividing, if you exponentiate one side of an equation, you need to exponentiate both. Right now, that won't be very helpful, so just using plain old algebra should help. Get 5x by itself, and then get x by itself.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

well how was I meant to know that?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Idk wtf you do with e

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

No worries, lol. It's like any other math operation; multiplication, division, addition, it always affects both sides, we just don't often realize it. No problem, e is just a constant, not a variable, so you can treat it exactly like you would any other number. So e might as well be 12, or 3. You can move it around; That being said, what do you think you should do to get x by itself?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I don't know?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

idk what constants or variables are

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Alright, so the next step here would be this: \[5x = e^{3.2} - 4\]This make sense? Alright, can talk about that in a second.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'm actually so fluttering stupid

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ha you can't swear. you can tell this site isnt irish

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Lul, no problem. So after subtracting across, what do you think the next step is to get x completely by itself?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

divide by 5

OpenStudy (anonymous):

?

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Yup! There you go. And now, all you have is constants on the right-hand side of your equation, so you can solve for x as a number. Were you allowed to use a calculator on this exam?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Was it multiple choice, or write-in?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

writing. I think you can leave the equation as it is because a lot of what we were doing was just isolating x

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Yep, exactly, so your final answer should be: \[x = \frac {e^{3.2}-4}{5}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok same as my own

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Alright, great!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what is the medal for? lol

OpenStudy (mendicant_bias):

Just because, haha, you figure it out.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!