Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 15 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Vector subspace question!! http://i.imgur.com/CXznr5g.png I thought d & e would be false but the rest would be true... D doesnt hold because if det(a)=0 then the 4th axiom ( the o one) would not hold, If I understand this right? Plus e would not hold because if it is all integers then K could be a fraction, not fitting in the restriction. no>?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

why do you think F holds ?

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

scalar multiplication will not change symmetry does adding/subtracting two symmetric matrices produce another symmetric matrix ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hum, I was thinking because if it is symmetric it would be a transpose no? and A^t=A

OpenStudy (anonymous):

because A^t = A then I can say A+B= B + A ( axiom 2) so A^t+B^t = A + B

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

Ahh yes you're right, adding/subtracting two symmetric matrices should result in a symmetric matrix

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

everything forms a subspace except for d and e

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that is what I put and I still get it wrong which troubles me :/

ganeshie8 (ganeshie8):

looks you forgot to check the last option

OpenStudy (anonymous):

A C and F are the answer... how isn't b part of it O.O

OpenStudy (anonymous):

if b is |dw:1415331058594:dw| with a 0 above and under the diagonal, it should always stay the same no? I mean multiplying a scalar won't change the 0s neither will adding the 0 matrix ( which in this case would be all 0s... unless that isn't considered row echelon form?)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!