Partial derivative question
\[\frac{ \delta z }{ \delta x } \] of \[x^2 - (y+z)^2 = 0\]
I got 1 but its somehow a different answer
Can't be that 1 is substituted back for the variables
So... \[\ f(x,y) = z = x^2 -(y+z)^2=0\]\[\ \frac{ \delta z }{ \delta x } = 2x \]
Do you have to solve for x as well? i'm unsure if you set this equal to 0 to solve for x.
x = y + z
Answer is \[\frac{ x }{ y+z }\] but getting there is not the same?
I solved for Z: \[x^2 - (y+z)^2 = 0\] \[-(y+z)^2 = -x^2\] \[(y+z)^2 = x^2\] \[y + z = x\] \[z = x- y\] \[\frac{ \delta z }{ \delta x } = 1\] where \[1 = \frac{ x }{ y+z }\]
refuse to believe the last part i inferred there
Was already set up at = 0
So, this means we are differentiating z with respect to x while y is held constant. So this is just implicit differentiation with y's as constants. So taking the derivative we would have: \[2x - 2(y+z)(0+ \frac{ \delta z }{ \delta x }) =0\] I'm okay to differentiate any x-variables, hence why I get 2x. The 2nd term is chain rule with y as a constant. I placed the 0 in the chain rule to make it more visible what I did. From here we just solve for dz/dx \[2x - 2(y+z)(0+\frac{ \delta z }{ \delta x }) = 0 \implies 2x = 2(y+z)\frac{ \delta z }{ \delta x } \implies \frac{ 2x }{ 2(y+z) } = \frac{ x }{ y+z } = \frac{ \delta z }{ \delta x }\]
And if x = y+z as you posted above, then you would end up with x/x = dz/dx and dz/dx would equal 1
NICEEE
Thanks guys
No problem :)
So that's how this works :) (I'm learning this as well in class)
Yeah, it's treated as implicit differentiation with the variables not mentioned in the partial treated as constants :P
why did you set 2x = 2x dz/dx?
Well, if I have 2x - 2(y+z)(0+dz/dx) = 0 after differentiating, I'm just simplifying it down and trying to solve for dz/dx 2x - 2(y+z)(0+ dz/dx) = 0 2x - 2(y+z)dz/dx = 0 2x = 2(y+z)dz/dx 2x/2(y+z) = dz/dx x/(y+z) = dz/dx All I want to do is somehow isolate dz/dx, so thats all that was done. Seemed easier algebraically to move it as I did.
Exactly I missed the + sign with the Zero term but nice this works out pretty well. Thank you for the detailed explanation, seriously. Have to look at implicit again before I make this mistake again
I'm going to retry this problem just to understand it better, haha
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!