can you help me on o to the zero power
|dw:1415813324756:dw|
thanks
in general x^0 = 1 , unless x = 0
there might be a good reason why 0^0 is undefined. I graphed y = x^x , and it is not defined when x = 0
define it as 1 if you are using binomial theorem or sequences
ok, since the limit of x^x as x->0+ is 1 ?
limit has got nothing to do with the function being defined right ?
the right side limit is 1 irrespective of whether x^x is defined at 0 or not
why would you define it as 1? seems kind of arbitrary
binomial theorem is not arbitrary
that should be (a+b)^n
also in calcII, while working with sequences we define it 0^0 as 1
yes because the limit of x^x is 1 as x->0+ , it seems natural to define it as 1
\[(a+b)^n = \sum\limits_{k=0}^n a^{n-k}b^k\] you want binomial theorem to be general and work for a=-b and n=0
just as you can define f(x)= sinx / x as 1 , when x = 0
sinx/x is not defined at x = 0
plugging up the removable discontinuity
im not sure where you would see this turn up in sequences (-b + b )^0 = sum k=0 ..0 , and gets kind of gnarly
(-b + b )^0 = sum {k=0 ..0} [(-b)^0 * b^0] = 1*1
\[e^x = \sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty} \dfrac{x^n}{n!}\] what can you say about the value of e^x at x = 0?
most power series representation require a piecewise definition if you dont define 0^0 = 1 when you're working with sequences
e^x = 1 + x + x^2/2 + x^3/ 6 + ...
e^0 = 1 + 0 + 0 + ...
you're just masking the actual problem by expanding like that
that expansion is a result of power series representation of e^x, not an alternative
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!