#1: If an increase in the supply of fish causes a huge decrease in the price of fish, we can assume... A. nothing useful. B. that total revenue fell for fish suppliers. C. that demand is very elastic. D. that demand is very inelastic. E. that demand is unit elastic. ***not sure!! @jim_thompson5910
#2: Find the price elasticity of demand using the midpoint formula: P1= $8, Q1 = 500, and when P2 = $12, Q2 = 300. A. 5/4 B. 4/5 C. 0.8 D. 2 E. 0.5 ***eek :( #3: If a moderate increase in the demand for tulip bulbs results in a huge increase in the price of tulip bulbs, we can assume... A. the supply is very inelastic. B. the supply is very elastic. C. suppliers had a lot of time to respond to the increase in demand. D. suppliers are very sensitive to changes in price. E. nothing useful. ***ahhhhhh :( #4: Which of the following is correct? A. If two goods are complements, their cross-price elasticity of demand is positive. B. If two goods are substitutes, their cross-price elasticity of demand is negative. C. If two goods are complements, their cross-price elasticity of demand is negative. D. If two goods are substitutes, their cross-price elasticity of demand remains the same. E. If two goods are complements, their cross-price elasticity of demand is negative, and if two goods are substitutes, their cross-price elasticity of demand is positive. ***confused iheartfood :( #5: If Mary’s total utility from a movie is 10 utils, and Nancy’s total utility from the same movie is 12 utils: A. Nancy clearly enjoyed the movie more than Mary. B. Mary enjoyed the movie almost as much as Nancy. C. Mary enjoyed the movie more than Nancy. D. we can assume nothing about their relative enjoyment. E. Nancy clearly enjoyed the movie more than Mary, and Mary enjoyed the movie almost as much as Nancy. ***econ is not my friend hahaa @jim_thompson5910 :D
for #4, read this article https://www.boundless.com/economics/textbooks/boundless-economics-textbook/elasticity-and-its-implications-6/other-demand-elasticities-55/cross-price-elasticity-of-demand-212-12303/
okie! :) so the answer for #4 is C? If two goods are complements, their cross-price elasticity of demand is negative. gathered this from this part "If two products are complements, an increase in demand for one is accompanied by an increase in the quantity demanded of the other. For example, an increase in demand for cars will lead to an increase in demand for fuel. If the price of the complement falls, the quantity demanded of the other good will increase. The value of the cross-price elasticity for complementary goods will thus be negative." is that correct?
4C looks good
for #2, read this article http://economicsonlinetutor.com/elasticitymidpoint.html
the formula given on that page is p.e.d. = [(Q2 - Q1) / ((Q1 + Q2) / 2)] / [(P2 - P1) / ((P1 + P2) / 2)]
a somewhat nicer way to write it [(Q2 - Q1) / ((Q1 + Q2) / 2)] ------------------------ [(P2 - P1) / ((P1 + P2) / 2)]
notice how we have (Q2-Q1) over (Q1 + Q2) / 2 in the numerator the same thing happens with P
yes:) okay so we end up getting (-200/400)/(4/10)= (-1/2) / (2/5) = -1.25 ?
did i do that right? :O
one sec while I check
oh wait no... that's not even an answer choice! :/
i did something wrong :/
there's a typo in your answer choices
so we have it like this? [(Q2 - Q1) / ((Q1 + Q2) / 2)] ------------------------ [(P2 - P1) / ((P1 + P2) / 2)] Q2-Q1=300-500= -200 Q1+Q2=500+300=800 ^^800/2 = 400 so the top part comes to -200/400 = -1/2 ? and then bottom part now P2-P1=12-8 =4 P1+P2=20 ^^20/2 =10 so (-1/2) / (4/10) = -1.25 wait what? so i did it right? :/
it is equal to -1.25 ?
and what i wrote above are the correct steps?
if so, maybe it must be positive? so 5/4 would be the answer? :/
yeah it should be -5/4
ahh okay i'll show my teacher the work on monday then :) but yay!! so i did the steps right! woooo:D
PED (price elasticity of demand) is always negative price goes up, demand goes down price goes down, demand goes up you have this inverse relationship which is why it is negative
ahh okie yay! :) so what about 1,3,and 5? do you get those? :O
one sec
okie!
ok I know the answer for #1, but idk how to explain it. I wish there was a way to have interactive graphs on here
hmm, let me think
okie:)
and yeah same here! maybe they'll add it sometime in the near future!!
|dw:1415947514212:dw|
let's say we have this supply and demand curve |dw:1415947529824:dw|
then the supply curve S1 shifts to S2 |dw:1415947557728:dw|
notice how the equilibrium price goes down
what happens if D was more elastic?
yes:) if it were more elastic, it could change up or down as well right?
but since it's not, it just stays the same?
would it be more steep? or more flat?
more steep right?
more flat actually
D1 is more elastic than D |dw:1415947722617:dw|
aw really? darn:( ahh mixing them up a bit! oops! and okay i see:)
now notice how the price differences are so small on D1 than for D
yes:) but the change is big though!
but if we had D2 being some very inelastic curve |dw:1415947774018:dw|
then this means that the more INelastic the demand is, the greater the price change
the supply curve only changes from S1 to S2 assume both have the same elasticity
ahh okay:) so for my problem #1, that means that it will be the demand is very inelastic? because of the huge drop in price?
correct
ahh okay yay!! wow that made a lot of sense hehe thank you!!!! woo!! so what about 3 and 5? :/
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!