Which of these is a valid conclusion? (4 points) All farmers wear straw hats. My father wears a straw hat. Therefore, my father is a farmer. All farmers wear straw hats. My father does not wear a straw hat. Therefore, my father is a farmer. All farmers wear straw hats. My father is not a farmer. Therefore, my father wears a straw hat. All farmers wear straw hats. My father is a farmer. Therefore, my father wears a straw hat.
none are necessarily correct
but the last one has more sense than the others
Not all farmers wear straw hats... but in accordance with this particular problem, the last one makes more sense
If its true that "All farmers wear straw hats. " and its true that 'My father is a farmer.' you can conclude that ' , my father wears a straw hat.'
so is it d?
@alikat641 @zzr0ck3r @perl
the premises don't have to be true in fact. the argument is saying *if* the premises are true (suppose there existed such a world), then does the conclusion necessarily follow?
in such a world where the premises true, does the conclusion have to be true as well?
no
in d it does
oh okay so its d?
yes
can u help with a few more?
if its true that all farmers wear hats (in some hypothetical world), and its true that my father is a farmer in this world, then it must also be true that my father wears a hat
|dw:1416100995764:dw|
thats premise 1
premise 2 says your dad is in the inner circle
|dw:1416101033688:dw|
so your dad must also be in the outer circle (people who wear hats)
oh yeah that makes sense!!
i have 2 more #s can u help
ok
Read the statements shown below. If a polygon has four sides, it is a quadrilateral. If the opposite angles of a quadrilateral are congruent, it is a parallelogram. Beth constructed a quadrilateral in the geometry class. Based on the given statements, which is a valid argument? (4 points) It can be concluded that Beth drew a rectangle. It can be concluded that Beth drew a parallelogram. It cannot be concluded that Beth drew a quadrilateral with opposite angles congruent. It cannot be concluded that Beth drew a polygon with four sides.
@perl
we have here 3 premises 1. If a polygon has four sides, it is a quadrilateral. 2. If the opposite angles of a quadrilateral are congruent, it is a parallelogram. 3.Beth constructed a quadrilateral in the geometry class.
i think that the answer is a
all it says is that beth constructed a quadrilateral
it doesnt make any mention of the opposite angles
so what is it then?
can you upload the assignment
It cannot be concluded that Beth drew a quadrilateral with opposite angles congruent.
since all it says is that beth drew a quadrilateral
what do u mean upload the assignment?
take a screenshot of the assignment
ill just copy and paste it
Which of these is a valid conclusion? (4 points) All farmers wear straw hats. My father wears a straw hat. Therefore, my father is a farmer. All farmers wear straw hats. My father does not wear a straw hat. Therefore, my father is a farmer. All farmers wear straw hats. My father is not a farmer. Therefore, my father wears a straw hat. All farmers wear straw hats. My father is a farmer. Therefore, my father wears a straw hat.
we already did this one
agh sorry thats my bad
Read the statements shown below. If a polygon has four sides, it is a quadrilateral. If the opposite angles of a quadrilateral are congruent, it is a parallelogram. Beth constructed a quadrilateral in the geometry class. Based on the given statements, which is a valid argument? (4 points) It can be concluded that Beth drew a rectangle. It can be concluded that Beth drew a parallelogram. It cannot be concluded that Beth drew a quadrilateral with opposite angles congruent. It cannot be concluded that Beth drew a polygon with four sides.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!