The Q asks for a def of initial RF, my ans is any RF not accelerating, the answer says any RF attached to particles on which no force act. Why? What's the diff?
@wio
initfial RF?
yes, initial reference frame
reference frame?
ok
same thing
except close to speed of light where change in mass is not a factor
No net acceleration would mean no net force, however gravity isn't considered a force in general relativity.
Yes, I thought so, but my answer is given as choice A, and correct answer says B
force is more accurate
as its considered relativistiv effects aswell
Well, I am in freshman phy so probably GR wound't count
wut is GR
we do have a sec on SR at the end of second semester, but that's it
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inertial_frame_of_reference#Newton.27s_inertial_frame_of_reference An inertial frame of reference is one in which the motion of a particle not subject to forces is in a straight line at constant speed.
\[\left| n0t \right|\]
lol
that was a hgood one
Even if they are equivalent, the definition is the definition.
Definition can lead to the outcome "not accelerating" perhaps, but it still wouldn't replace the definition.
got it thx
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!