how can i make -1+sqrt(3i) into trig form
@wio let's solve this!!
Never tried these types of problems before, I'm interested. I don't know where to begin though, lol.
It is\[ -1+\sqrt 3 i \]Or is it: \[ -1+\sqrt{3i} \]
I believe the \(i\) should not be in the square root, but if it is we can still do this.
Shall we try it both ways?
Okay, we can do that.
So the trig form would is like: \[ a+bi = re^{i\theta} = r[\cos(\theta) + i\sin(\theta)] \]
http://openstudy.com/study#/updates/530bfd53e4b03fec1e318cfc was looking at previous examples.
Basically, \((a,b)\) represent the Cartesian coordinates, while the polar coordinates are \((r,\theta)\).
Oh i see.
So: \[ r = \sqrt{a^2+b^2} \\ \theta =\tan^{-1}\left(\frac ab\right) \]
It really is that simple.
I thought it'd be a little bit more complex...haha.
One thing to notice is that \(a^2+b^2 = z\bar z\) where \(z=a+bi\) and \(\bar z=a-bi\) (called the conjugate).
We call \(r=\sqrt{z\bar z}\) the modulus or \(z\), for some reason, and we call \(\theta\) the argument.
Oh okay. Makes sense.
so \[ r = \sqrt{1^2+\sqrt{3}^2} = \sqrt{1+3} = 2 \]
Whoops, I messed up earlier. I should have said: \[ \theta = \tan^{-1}\left(\frac ba\right) \]
b/a?... Oh yeah, similar to y/x
In fact, it would be easier to just say \[ z=x+yi \]and use \((x,y)\). By convention \((a,b)\) is more popular.
I don't like complex analysis, because we should just be learning about 2D vectors instead.
Hmm.
The only thing about complex analysis that is interesting is complex multiplication. There isn't any vector equivalent.
Well, maybe a couple other things as well. I never fully did complex analysis.
I didn't know that's what this was xD
Anyway \[ \theta = \tan^{-1}\left(\frac{\sqrt3}{-1}\right)=-\frac{\pi}{3} \left(=-60^\circ\right) \]
\[ -1+\sqrt 3i = 2\left[\cos\left(-\frac\pi 3\right)+i\sin\left(-\frac\pi 3\right)\right] \]
Wait, why is \(a=1\)? Wouldn't \(a=1\)?
\[ r = \sqrt{(-1)^2+(\sqrt{3})^2} = \sqrt{1+3} = 2 \]
Oh that's right. Okay.
In the case of: \[ -1+\sqrt{3i} \]You basically have to find the \(\sqrt{i}\), which actually has two solutions.
Heyoooo, Euler's Formula, I *do* recognize at least some of this, lol.
\[ i = (x+yi)^2=(x^2-y^2)+(2xy)i \]
This means\[ x^2-y^2=0,\quad 2xy = 1 \]
since we can say \(i = (0) + (1)i\)
I'm little stuck! not understanding where the 0 and 1 are coming from...>.<
Well, basically \(i\) is a complex number of the form \(x+yi\) where \((x,y) = (0,1)\).
Oh okay. I thought you derived it from something else. Nvm!
\[ x^2-y^2=0\implies x^2=y^2 \implies |x|=|y| \implies x=y,x=-y \]Plug it into the other equation an: \[ 2yy=1,2(-y)y = 1 \]
Oh cool
We can't let \(x\) or \(y\) be imaginary numbers, so the only equation that matters is: \[ 2y^2=1 \implies y=\pm \sqrt{\frac{1}{2}} \]
Why can we not let them be imaginary?
Because they come from: \[ x+yi\], which is already a complex number, with real coefficients.
Ohh. I see that connection.
Okay, so let's test it out real quick: \[ \left(\frac 1{\sqrt 2} + \frac 1{\sqrt{2}}i \right)^2 \]
\[ =\frac 12 +\frac 12i+\frac 12i -\frac 12 = \left(\frac 12 -\frac 12\right) +\left(\frac 12+\frac 12\right)i = 0+1i = i \]
If that is a solution, then so is: \[ -\frac 1{\sqrt2}-\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}i \]
nvm that would result in something completely different.
No, if \(z^2=i\) then \((-z)^2=i\). This works for complex numbers as well.
Ahh, interesting. O_o
We ended up with\[ x=y\\ 2y^2=1 \]So we know \(x\) and \(y\) must have the same sign and absolute value.
I see. Got it.
Another way to do this, with less algebra, is to use trig coordinates.
\[ i=(0)+i(1)=1[\cos(\pi/2)+i\sin(\pi/2)]=1e^{i\pi/2} = e^{i\pi/2} \]
Take the square root, and we get: \[ \pm\sqrt{e^{i\pi/2}} = \pm e^{i\pi/4} = \pm[\cos(\pi/4)+i\sin(\pi/4)] = \pm\left[\frac 1{\sqrt2}+\frac 1{\sqrt2}i\right] \]
The only reason all of this works is due to the fact that: \[ [\cos(\theta)+i\sin(\theta)]^n = \cos(n\theta)+i\sin(n\theta) \]
And this formula works due to than double angle formula: \[ \cos(2\theta) = \cos^2(\theta)-\sin^2(\theta)\\ \sin(2\theta) = 2\cos(\theta)\sin(\theta) \]
Ah, I don't think i'm comfortable with the function of \(i\) as of yet. I have to keep referencing back to your post describing what it is. \[i = (x+yi)^2=(x^2-y^2)+(2xy)i \iff x^2-y^2=0,\quad 2xy = 1\]
I understand how it equates to 0 and 1, but now i'm confused with how you got to \[=1[\cos(\pi/2)+i\sin(\pi/2)]=1e^{i\pi/2} = e^{i\pi/2}\] That part.
Well, I wanted:\[ (0)+i(1) = \cos(\theta) + i\sin(\theta) \]where \[ \cos(\theta) =0,\quad \sin(\theta) =1 \]
The only places where \(\cos(\theta)=0\) (in the first revolution \(\theta \in [0,2\pi)\)), is \(\theta=\pi/2\) and \(\theta=3\pi/2\).
Ok, i get that.
That gives \(\sin(\pi/2)=1\) and \(\sin(3\pi/2)=-1\)... so we say \(\theta=\pi/2\).
Then \[ (0)+i(1) = \cos(\pi/2)+i\sin(\pi/2). \]
Understood.
I basically just converted \(i\) to its trig coordinates. Since you have sort of learned it a moment ago, I figured you would get it. But you're not completely familiar yet so I was going too fast.
Yeah a little bit.
But after that explanation I found the connection.
Actually, for \(i\) my method for finding \(\theta\) breaks down a bit since you are using: \[ \theta = \tan^{-1}\left(\frac 10\right) \]
I see.
You just have to realize that when \[ \tan(\theta) = \pm \infty \]Then it gives you \[ \theta = \pm \pi/2 + 2\pi n \]
Well yeah. |dw:1417386677139:dw| I just had to visualize it.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!