What are the rules for solving for x? 8^x = (1/32)^(x-2)
\[8^x = (\frac{ 1 }{ 32 })^{x-2}\]
yuck ok so, first question, what can you do to bring the exponents down?
You have two choices, factor or use logarithms.
(I personally prefer logs, and it is not nearly as yucky as it was upon first inspection)
Factoring would lead to the realization that \(8=2^3\) and \(1/32 = 2^{-5}\).
\(\LARGE\color{black}{ 8^x=(\frac{1}{32})^{x-2} }\) \(\LARGE\color{black}{ 8^x=(\frac{1}{2^5})^{x-2} }\) \(\LARGE\color{black}{ 8^x=(2^{-5})^{x-2} }\) \(\LARGE\color{black}{ (2^3)^x=(2^{-5})^{x-2} }\) \(\LARGE\color{black}{ (2)^{3x}=(2^{-5})^{x-2} }\) \(\LARGE\color{black}{ (2)^{3x}=(2^{})^{-5(x-2)} }\)
hope you can take it from here.
Yep Solomon Thanks!
I don't usually notice that type of stuff, nice catch wio, I need a more accross the board method
When working with logs, you generally want to factor anyway.
sort of, instead of having to notice the ways you can rewrite two, you can take a log of both sides, then by properties of logs, you can bring down the exponents and solve for x
Ohh ok so Solomon's method would be my number one choice?
@OwdinMW Maybe you should do your own homework. Maybe you'd learn something that way.
it's up to personal preference essentially
\[\frac{1}{a^m} = a^{-m} \\ (a^m)^n = a^{m \times n} \\ If \ \ \ a^m = a^n, \implies m = n\]
Alright :) thank you!
Have you studied logarithms @OdinMW ?
Yes. I'm just getting into them.
If you are just getting into them, chances are you should do the problem both ways to ensure you recieve credit
\[\log_{b}\frac{ m }{ n } = \log_{b} m - \log_{b} n\]
have you learned about how to bring down exponents with logs?
@FibonacciChick666 yes
First thing you want to do here is change the fraction into a negative exponent. \[ 8^x=32^{2-x} \]
i concur
Then you would use logs.
then what would happen if you took log base 8 of both sides?
Yes @wio thats something I should have thought of.
You can keep the base to be whatever you want for the beginning.
or ln, either works
So the log of both sides gives: \[ x\log 8=(2-x)\log32 \]
personally, I prefer base 8 here because it makes less work later
and I think you can manage from there odin
8
Yes
Whoops, I wrote down the wrong thing.
i got, more along the lines of x=2log32-xlog32
the log in this case was base 8
Im thinking its getting a little too much haha. I would like to know how to solve it with logs but I think Ill just use Solomon's method...
loooooossssseeeeerrrrrrrrrsssssssssss
Hmmm:\[ x\log 8=(2-x)\log32\\ x\log8=2\log32-x\log32\\ x\log8+x\log 32 = 2\log 32\\ x(\log8+\log32)=2\log32\\ x = \frac{2\log 32}{\log8+\log32} \]
x=2log32-xlog32< this is just a two step problem from here, it's not that bad, I swear :)
or what wio did
Change it to base \(2\), and it becomes: \[ x = \frac{2(5)}{(3)+(5)} \]
If you had \[ \log_8(32) \]You can always convert this to another base \(c\) using the property: \[ \log_ab = \frac{\log_cb}{\log_ca} \]
In general, you either want your base to be a prime number, or you just want to use the natural log \(\ln\).
\[x=32\] basically...right?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!