Ask your own question, for FREE!
Physics 8 Online
OpenStudy (mony01):

Starting with Equation 1, and applying Equation 2, show that the stretching of rubber to a new length, lx requires a force given by: F = NkT (λ_x − 1/λ^2_x)(b_0)(t_0) Equation1:W=1/2NkT(λ^2_x+2/λ_x-3)l_0 b_0 t_0 Equation 2: F=dW/dl_x

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the notation is a bit confusing. I'm pretty sure I have the right equations, but do you think you could try typing them with the equation editor?

OpenStudy (mony01):

\[F=NkT(\lambda _{x}-\frac{ 1 }{ \lambda ^{2}_{x} })b _{0}t _{0}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that's useful, i had it wrong haha. if you could do that i'll take a look.

OpenStudy (mony01):

\[W=\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }NkT(\lambda _{x}^{2}+\frac{ 2 }{ \lambda _{x} }-3)l _{0}b _{0}t _{0}\]

OpenStudy (mony01):

Equation 2: \[F=\frac{ dW }{ dl _{x} }\]

OpenStudy (mony01):

would you be able to help me?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think the main idea is to take the derivative of W with respect to l_x. to do that, you need to rewrite the mass density lambda as m/l_x

OpenStudy (mony01):

you mean like this \[w=\frac{ 1 }{ 2}NkT(\frac{ m }{ lx }+\frac{ 2 }{ \frac{ m }{ lx } }-3)l _{0}b _{0}t _{0}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yep. don't forget the square on the first term

OpenStudy (mony01):

oh yea...so is that the answer?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No, you have to take the derivative of the W with respect to l_x now

OpenStudy (mony01):

how would i do that?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Everything is a constant. You simply derivate any l_x you see.

OpenStudy (mony01):

i dont get it

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I actually just did the derivation and it's wrong. I don't think lamda is mass density. It's something called extension ratio. It's l_x / l_0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I'll try to walk you through that with the new info

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So we can write the work equation as:\[W=\frac{1}{2}NkT(\frac{l_{x}^{2}}{l_{0}^{2}}+\frac{2l_{0}}{l_{x}}-3)l_{0}b_{0}t_{0}\]

OpenStudy (mony01):

ok

OpenStudy (mony01):

no we derive?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yep, with respect to l_x

OpenStudy (mony01):

do we use like chain rule?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Nope, you just need to do each term separately. Only a product would need chain rule.

OpenStudy (mony01):

i dont really know how to do it

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay I'll go through it, just give me a moment.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I keep going through it and i'm ending up with an extra factor that shouldn't be there. So i'm reserving typing this out until I get the right thing.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I keep getting:\[W=\frac{NkT}{l_{0}^{2}}(\lambda _{x}-\frac{1}{\lambda_{x}^{2}})b_{0}t_{0}\] I don't know where I'm getting the extra factor of l_o^2

OpenStudy (mony01):

is this the answer?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It shouldn't have the lo^2 in the denominator. It should be what it says you should get for F. i wrote W by accident. Should be an F.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!