(a) Let F = 5y i + 2 j − k and C be the line from (3, 2, -2) to (6, 1, 7). Find integral_C F · dr= (b) Let G = 5xe^(5x^2+2y^2+z^2) i + 2ye^(5x^2+2y^2+z^2) j + ze^(5x^2+2y^2+z^2) k and C be the same as in part (a). find integral_C G · dr =
@ganeshie8 can you help me with this one for part a i use the F.T. F.L.I and i get -5 but its wrong
@ganeshie8 I did it again and i got -11 but its also wrong. what am I doing wrong
gradf(5yi+2j-k) = 5yx+2y -z right??
you need to parameterize and setup the line integral, right ?
i'm not sure
for part a i try using the FTFLT
for part b, try \(\large \frac{e^{231}-e^{57}}{2}\)
its right, how did you figured it out?
vector field in part b is conservative so you can eyeball the potential function
find the curl
you should get 0 if the field is conservative
what do you do after you find that the curl is 0
curl=0 tells you the field is conservative so a potential function exists
go and find it
\[\vec{G} = 5xe^{5x^2+2y^2+z^2} i + 2ye^{5x^2+2y^2+z^2}j + ze^{5x^2+2y^2+z^2}k\]
if you stare at it long enough you will see that below potential function works : \[f(x,y,z) = \frac{1}{2}e^{5x^2+2y^2+z^2}\]
take partials of that function and convince yourself that you get the components of the given vector field
so you take the integral of f(x,y,z)
find the gradient of f(x,y,z)
find the partial derivatives
if you take that gradient you get G
Exactly! we also say G is a gradient field
all below are equivalent : 1) conservative field 2) gradient field 3) path independent field 4) potential function exists for a field 5) curl is 0
if one of them in the list is true, then eveything else in that list is also true
so by taking the partial derivatives of f(x,y,z) you get the answer?
taking partial derivatives convinces you that below is the potential function of given vector field \[f(x,y,z) = \frac{1}{2}e^{5x^2+2y^2+z^2}\]
so the work done when you go from (3, 2, -2) to (6, 1, 7) equals : \[f(6,1,7) - f(3,2,-2)\]
evaluate ^
so technically all you need is to find the potential function if the curl is 0
great
Yep because setting up line integral is more painful
finding the potential function is easy
and you can find potential function ONLY when the field is conservative
potential function wont exist if the field is not conservative
so what about part a? is using the FTFLT a good idea?
whats FTFLT ?
fundamental theorem of line integrals
that works only for conservative fields right ?
smooth curves
we have used fundamental theorem of line integral for part b
but it wont apply for part a because the field is not conservative
find the curl and see if you get 0 or not
curl is (0,0,-5)
its non zero
no
that tells us that the vector field in part a is not conservative
so you cant find a potential function
that means fundamental theorem of calc for line integrals is not useful here
is that clear ?
yeah
so what could we use?
parameterize the path as usual
try 11.5
well i dont have any more trys
so for the parametric equation you get x=3+3t, y=2-t, z-2+9t
?
how did you get 11.5? @ganeshie8
evaluate the line integral
x=3+3t, y=2-t, z = -2+9t dx = 3 dt dy = -1 dt dz = 9 dt
\[\int_C \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r} = \int_C 5ydx + 2dy - dz \]
\[= \int\limits_0^1 5(2-t)(3 dt) + 2(-dt) - 9dt\]
\[= \int\limits_0^1 (5(2-t)(3 ) + 2(-1) - 9)~dt\]
simplify and evaluate the integral ^
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%5Cint_0%5E1+%285%282-t%29*3+%2B+2%28-1%29+-9%29+dt
yeah i got this but i have a equation how do you know the limits of integration?
x=3+3t, y=2-t, z = -2+9t you are starting at (3,2,-2), so 3+3t = 3 2-t = 2 -2+9t = -2 solve t
that gives you lower bound of t
you can find the upper bound similarly
oh ok I understand it now thank you @ganeshie8
when you parameterize a line segment like this by using the direction vector the bounds will be always (0,1) il let you figure out why..
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!