Stokes' Theorem problem, posted below shortly.
Posting the prompt in an imgur link this time: http://i.imgur.com/yfzci0h.png
\[\int\limits_{}^{}\triangledown \times F \cdot n = \iint \text{(some stuff)}\]
No... \[ \int_C\mathbf F ~d\mathbf r = \iint_S\nabla\times\mathbf F~d\mathbf S \]
you want to evaluate using stokes thm first ?
I was like 99% sure that Stokes' Theorem had grad cross f dot n in its argument. What am I thinking of that isn't Stokes' but also has that integrand?
And yeah, using stokes theorem would be good.
okay start by finding the curl : \(\nabla \times \vec{F} \)
\[\vec{F} = \langle x^2y,~ y,~ xz\rangle \]
Alright, doing that now. Need to remember how to write matrices in LaTeX again, lol...
Whatever, just going to compute it without writing up the matrix.
Or is not a closed interval? :o
(I don't know the LaTeX command for that kind of integral, heh, looking at it now)
Well, it's the boundary of a surface
Ah, got it.
So it will be closed path
Just learned Stokes like 3 days ago.
Yeah, I'm trying to remember everything that I've already repeatedly learned, I have about the long term memory retention of a poodle.
\[\text{Curl} \ F=-(z)j+(x^2)k\]
lets double check with wolfram http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=curl+%28x%5E2y%2C+y%2C+xz%29
Oh, yeah, I see why.
Alright, got that part. Man, I'm just out of willpower right now, this isn't even necessary tough, but I'm just burnt out from my previous three finals in the last ~36 hours. Somebody tell me to keep trying, lol.
this is fairly easy compared to your previous problem find the ndS and take dot product
|dw:1418198291197:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!