Prove that x^2+4 is an irreducible polynomial in R[x] Please help
Do you have the Eisenstein criterion yet?
Not yet.
hmm its easy with that, \(2|4\) but \(2^2\cancel{|}1\)
What all do you have?
I stuck at this: Suppose x^2 +4 is reducible, then it can be factored as (ax+b)(cx+d) , it gives me x = -b/a and x =-d/c are roots of the x^2+4 but how to argue that they are not in real?
Can you use the fact that this can have at most two roots?
another way to approach is open the bracket and get \[acx^2+x(ad+bc)+bd=x^2+4\] that is ac = 1 ad+bc =0 bd =4 then??
Sec I am getting my book out
Back to the first option. if x =-b/a is a root, then (-b/a)^2 +4 =0 or \(\dfrac{b^2}{a^2}+4=0\) then??
Ok do you know about the whole f(x) = g(x)h(x)+r(x) where r(x) has degree less than or equal to g(x)
yes.
ok just trying to find out what all we can use
\(\color{blue}{\text{Originally Posted by}}\) @Loser66 another way to approach is open the bracket and get \[acx^2+x(ad+bc)+bd=x^2+4\] that is ac = 1 ad+bc =0 bd =4 then?? \(\color{blue}{\text{End of Quote}}\) Well, this means that a and c have the same sign, so does b and d
So consider the four cases.
a and c are positive, b and d are positive.. then?
ac + bd \(\neq 0\)
Then you can't have 0 in this case,
Do you know that if it is degree 2 or 3, then it is irreducible over a field F if and only if it has a zero in F?
This is not hard to prove
then we can use the theorem of no more roots than n and we are done
If a and c are positive and b and d are negative?
@wio then ac = bd
Then ad is negative and bc is negative, so they can't add up to 0
How about saying that \[ x^2 + 4 > 0 \] for any real x. So it cannot have real roots. So it cannot be factored over R. Am I missing something?
@Loser66 Do you think you can do the rest now?
@zzr0ck3r If approach on that way, we have to prove why reducible polynomial has a root :)
@wio yes, Sir. It gives contradiction when ac =1 and bd =4 , right?
@eliassaab yes, it is quite clear. Can I do it??? I am doubt myself :)
Oh, at the end up, it has many ways to solve. Thanks you all. :)
Oh, his way is simplest
It just needs to be understood that you need real roots to be reducible
:)
@Loser66 yes, you can it take it to the bank.
@Loser66 C Is an extension of R, if we can show that there are two roots in C\R (very easy), then we are done since there are no roots in R, the degree 2 polynomial is irreducible.
@eliassaab I think this is true iff degree 2 or 3 I have this proof in my notes \(f(x)\in F(x)\) then for \(f(x) \) degree \(2\) or \(3\) we have \(f(x)\) is irreducible if and only if \(f\) has a root in \(f\). I am not sure this is true for the other cases? Either way as I am sure they are starting from scratch, it should prob be proved.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!