Fan + Medal
|dw:1418565695414:dw|
|dw:1418565732939:dw|
So we can clearly see that in elliptical path the sun is much more closer to the earth at some points while in circular path the distance between the sun and earth is much greater and remains constant.
Is that making sense?
How realistic is this question? I'm not sure I really agree with the premise of the question to begin with.
So A?
What is your course title?
Earth & Space
I don't believe it's A because during an elliptical orbit it will get closer to the sun, but it will also spend more time away from the sun causing there to be more days further away allowing there wiggle room for the average temperature to even out... It just seems like this question can only feed into the misconception that the earth is closer to the sun during the summer...
Yes, this is what i was thinking too!
Okay Kainui one of these option is the answer to the question, they're not trying to trick me
Can option D be considered?
I don't know about D
This question seems worded weirdly, the orbits don't cause change in seasons, that happens from the rotation of the axis of earth.
It's just too imprecise to say what the answer should be, there needs to me some numbers and calculus going on here for me to give you a straight answer. "more elliptical" doesn't necessarily mean "strictly closer" since it also implies that it goes further as well if it maintains the same total energy. I think @Abhisar is right in saying D. B is pretty vague, and C seem to be definitely wrong.
I guess we can use some conics kai and figure it out xD
Yes, I think the question is tricking us. The answer should be D only...
D was wrong
It's not D
I am no longer interested in this question. Bye, good luck.
The energy does not affect global temperature on the earth
How @iambatman ?
If we're talking about it being warm at certain parts it doesn't have much to do with the sun as I said earlier it's related to the axis rotation of the Earth itself. I'm not sure about B, there would need to be some calculation...
I already got the question wrong and I have no chance to fix it so there's really no point in debating about ot
The statement only solar energy may be suspicious. If D is wrong then option A is the only one which seems correct to me...
If you're only interested in getting right answers, you're in the wrong place. We want you to learn, this question is pretty interesting I suppose.
@CaseyCarns Is right. We are right. It is her professor that is wrong and we know the answer as far as the poorly answered question can possibly be. Carns was never interested in knowing the truth, only in getting points.
Well, I was interested in knowing the actual reason. Thank you everyone for participating in the discussion :)
I'm sort of skeptical about A
My guess, - length of semi major axis of ellipse = radius of circle - more circular implies eccentricity tending to 1 Maybe we should look at this Q from point of solid angle.
When is the earth ever in a more or less elliptical orbit? What does this even MEAN? Nothing, it's a vacuous statement.
Kai they are just saying to assume...
Does it not make perfect sense that you can change the Earth's orbit from being more or less elliptical and maintain the same average global temperature?
It could be A actually, like if it was a circle the energy distribution would be same everywhere right, but for an ellipse there are certain points where it can gather more energy, mhm, but this is without doing the math and assuming.
There's no content nor context to this, it is meaningless... This never happens and they have not described how it were to happen if it did.
I agree haha, idk I guess. I rather not make things up either.
Okay, let's research a lil bit on it..
Read this http://www.bgs.ac.uk/discoveringGeology/climateChange/general/causes.html?src=topNav
Mhm...that's interesting.
I didn't knew that, it says orbit changes from ellipse to circular at certain periods..
I don't remember learning this in astronomy xD
So option A was cortrect...
Yeah I guess so, pretty much what I was saying earlier, about my guess on energy with shapes haha.
Not exactly. Unfortunately this only says the climate is warmer during the time when the earth is closer to the sun. This does not say the average temperature rises. This would be like having a box full of sand and then shifting it so that the level of the sand is higher on one side rather than the other. This doesn't imply that there is more sand in the box: |dw:1418567640304:dw| As you can see from the picture they've shown, the elliptical orbit also ends up further away on the aphelion is colder than the circular orbit as well. Not to mention the earth spends a much longer time period while further away since Kepler's laws say that the planet sweeps out "equal areas in equal amounts of time". So it might be that the average temperature is in fact colder during an elliptical orbit.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!