please help
@iGreen. @SolomonZelman
I'm terrible at proofs :(
Me too :(
you need to determine the mistake. Read the proof while I am reading it, and tell me what you think.
Hopefully @SolomonZelman knows. :D
okay thanks @iGreen
ok @SolomonZelman
I think it's b since I don't think that statement 3 is necessary
The answer can't be a because statement 1 was given and statement 4 was accurately labeled
you know what an angle-angle-side postulate ? (they use the same angle in option 4)
not really
oh oh.... I am looking at option 5, and yes, you can't tell me that: |dw:1419020250157:dw|
they are not the corresponding, or not necessarily corresponding.
how are angles LNO and NPM congruent?
I am saying that they are NOT (Necessarily) congruent, and you can see why, correct?
yes
this is what option 5 points out as a mistake
okay, thanks so much!
yes, and angle-side-side postulate is this: they have the top angle ( N) in both triangles, the angles 1 and 2, and sides NL NP equal to each other. |dw:1419020515478:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!