open cover of a set is denoted by \(\left\{ U_{\alpha} \right\}\). What does alpha stand for?
maybe an index?
indexing set i think @zzr0ck3r
can you give examples? like what does \(\left\{ U_{\pi} \right\}\)
...stand for?
um its just a stand in for an index so the amount of sets you are taking the union of is \(\alpha\)
\(\pi\) would not make sense if we are talking about 3.14....
but we use pi for many things...
but alpha doesn't have to be a natural number tho?
no
you can have infinite and uncountable infinite
Just really bad short notation....
if i remember correctly you could define alpha as an interval \[\alpha_n = (1, n)\] then the set \(\{U_{\alpha_{1}}\}\) refers to the set \((1, 1)\)
let's say the interval [0,1]. How would you denote that for every element in [0,1] take a ball of radius 1/10?
@zzr0ck3r please correct me if i talk nonsense :)
Yeah that seems fine to me. its just notation...
should be like this i think then the set \(\{U_{\alpha_{1}}\}\) refers to the set \(\{(1, 1)\}\)
so you want the collection of balls around x s.t. x is in that set?
yes @zzr0ck3r
so is alpha is like the notation for sequence a(n) where a itself does not represent a number?
alpha is really bad notation for this \(\cup_{i\in \alpha}A_i\)
where A_i is one of the setes in the collection and there are \(\alpha\) sets
\(\{B(x,\frac{1}{10}) \mid x\in [0,1]\}\)
:O so alpha is a set?
yes, an indexed set
\(\alpha\) is a member of an index set, say \(\Gamma\)
\(\alpha\) is the indexed set
we would never just list a member of an index as subscript in a union, there would be no point
the whole time i thought it was a number! -.- that's why it got even more confused when it comes to the notation for subcover
every number is a set ;)
I mean in your example of your open cover \(\{U_\alpha\}\), \(\alpha\) is a member of some index set.
no, I think alpha is the indexed set, why would you union the elements of a set, you just get back the set.....
second line
its bad notation lol
wikipedia is right, \(\alpha\) is a member of index set \(A\) there
but this short notation stands for the union of the indexed set.
read the next line
the next line is consistent, the collection of \(U_\alpha\) meaning \(\alpha\) runs through some index set. If you have learned topology before, it is a common notation that \(\alpha\) is a member of an index set.
For example you can write \(\{U_\alpha\mid \alpha \in [0,1]\}\) or \(\bigcup_{\alpha \in [0,1]}U_\alpha\)
I would never write it like this and this is why I say its bad notation. I would write it as \(\cup_{I\in I}A_i\)
err \(\cup_{i\in I}A_i \)
they wrote \(\cup_i\)
well, there is no different with your notation. They just don't specify, what is the exact index set, but that is ok, to save space and time.
I am saying what if we have sets \(A_1=\{1,2,3,4\},A_2=\{a,b,c,d\}\) and lets say our index is then explin to me wht \(U_1\) is?
where our index is \(I=\{1,2\}\)
They don't specify the collection either...
so again this is just bad notation for what I said. It does not any longer stand for an element or we would just have \(\cup_1=\cup A_1=A_1\)
Yes, by you give a name to your set of index and one can avoid it either
Let say by saying \(\bigcup_\alpha A_\alpha\)
In this notation it is understood that you have an index set in the background where the \(\alpha\) is a particular member in this set.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!