Medal to the first person to answer correctly! Evaluate this:
\[\LARGE \Re({ e^z})\]
whats r and whats z
R means evaluate the real part, z is a complex number.
Whoops I messed up, oh well. I meant to write \[\LARGE \Re({ e^{iz}})\] But it's too late now lol
so R(a+bi)=a? that is the definition of that function?
I tried this the other day and I got \[ e^{-\Im(z)} \cos(\Re(z)) \]
But I don't think it was right.
where a and b are real
Not quite, the real and imaginary parts exist separately as a linear combination as a+bi. a is the real and b is the imaginary.
what does evaluates the real part mean
So if I ask for the real part of z^2 then I would do this \[\Large z^2 = (a+bi)^2 = a^2+b^2 -i2ab\] So we write \[\Large \Im(z^2) = -2ab \\ \Large \Re(z^2) = a^2+b^2\]
so R(a+bi)=a then?
Yep
ok i got confused for a second when you said not quite
Oh I was answering wio, sorry for the confusion
\[e^{i (a+bi)}= \cos(a+bi)+i \sin(a+bi)\] so then we would use sum identities I suppose this might turn ugly
Okay, now I get: \[ \cos(\Re(z))\cosh(\Im(z))-\cos(\Re(z))\sinh(\Im(z)) \]
\(e^{-\mathcal{I}(z)}\cdot \cos(\mathcal{R}(z))\)
Nope to all. =P There is only one real and imaginary part and they exist like this and this only \[\Large f(z) = \Re(z) + i \Im(z)\]
\[e^{i(a+bi)}=\cos(a)\cos(bi)-\sin(a)\sin(bi)+i(\sin(a)\cos(bi)+\cos(a)\sin(bi)) \\ =\cos(a)\cosh(b)-\sin(a) \cdot i \sin(x)+i(\sin(a)\cosh(b)+\cos(a) \cdot i(\sin(b)) \\ =\cos(a)\cosh(b)-\sin(b)\cos(a)-\sin(a)\sin(x)i+\sin(A)\cosh(b)i\]
@freckles is on the right path, but he's forgotten exponent rules. =P
so the real part is cos(a)cosh(b)-sin(b)cos(a)?
if i didn't make a mistake
oh
freckles is she
freckles can be a he who knows
and yes I totally forgot the exponent thingy
This equation is not true\[\Large f(z) = \Re(z) + i \Im(z)\]
@freckles ,whatever this unicorn may be, you might like that you can derive trig identities this way!\[\Large e^{i(\theta + \phi)} = \cos(\theta + \phi) +i \sin(\theta + \phi) \\ \Large e^{i \theta}e^{i \phi}=(\cos \theta +i \sin \theta) (\cos \phi + i \sin \phi)\]
@wio lol unfortunately you're wrong.
Every complex function has a real and imaginary part.
Let\(f(z) = z^2\). Then \(f(i) = -1\), and not \(\Re(i) + \Im(i)i = (0)+(1)i = i\).
I'm fairly certain that: \[ \Re(e^z)=\cos(\Re(z))\cosh(\Im(z))-\cos(\Re(z))\sinh(\Im(z)) \]
One way to find an explicit formula for Re and Im is to just realize that the conjugate negates the imaginary part. \[\Large \bar z = a-bi\]\[\Large z + \bar z = 2a \\...so \\ \Large \Re(z) = \frac{z+ \bar z}{2}\] Similarly we have \[\Large \Im (z) = \frac{z - \bar z}{i2}\]
\[e^{i(a+bi)}=e^{ai+bi^2}=e^{-b}e^{ai}=e^{-b}(\cos(a)+i \sin(a)) \\ e^{-b} \cos(a)+i e^{-b} \sin(a)\] this seems to easy did i fail
the real part is e^(-b)cos(a)
Yes perfect!
which is what I wrote above
And I wrote it before watchmath wrote it, but it is wrong, lol
i don't know what the fancy stuff is :p
I was asking for Re(z), if you give me an answer in terms of R(z) then it isn't the answer.
No, you were asking for \(\Re(f(z))\) and you are probably going to need \(\Re(z)\) and \(\Im(z)\).
what do you mean? it is the same a = imaginary part of z= I(z) and b=real part of z =R(z) so \(e^{-I(z)}\cos(Re(z))\) is the same
Remember that \(a=\Re(z)\) and \(b=\Im(z)\)
Yeah you're right, I guess I'll just have to give you all a third of a medal.
However since 1/3 rounds down to 0, I guess nobody gets medals. =(
But @Kainui , I'm not sure that @freckles and @watchmath . In fact, I think this is a part where Euler's equation somehow breaks down.
Okay, actually, let me explain a bit better
What @freckles gave was:\[ f(z) = e^{iz} \]
Oh? Keep going.
There are two ways to go about doing this problem, one is use exponent algebra, and the other is to use trig sum formula and hyperbolic trig functions
They should lead to the same result, but I want to try it out on both to be sure.
ok, I just gave wio a medal :D
Oh wio by the way I just discovered the derivation of the Cauchy-Riemann equations, it's almost obvious after you see it lol.
Here is one way to do it:\[ e^{z} = e^{i((a+ib)/i)} = e^{i(b-ai)} = e^{bi+a}=e^{a}e^{ib} = e^a\cos(b)+e^ai\sin(b) \]
Wait, wtf did I just do, that was sort of a waste.
Just take the partial derivative\[\Large \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}=\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}\frac{\partial z}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial z} \\ \Large \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}=\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}\frac{\partial z}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial z} i\] Then set the right hand sides equal after dividing the second one by i to get: \[\Large \frac{ \partial f}{\partial x} = \frac{1}{i} \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\] and there are your two equations after you plug in f=u+iv.
Lol, wtf? Okay, but then:\[ e^z = e^{i(z/i)} = \cos(z/i)+i\sin(z/i) \]
I think it is kind of nice, then we get relations like this: \[\Large \cos(ix)=\cosh(x)\] So you can think of how a circle is perpendicular to a hyperbola in a conic section maybe to make sense of this?
\[ \cos(b-ai)+i\sin(b-ai) = \cos(b)\cosh(a)+\ldots \]Don't you think it is weird how we didn't have \(\cosh\) in our previous solution?
@Kainui There is something fishy going on, don't you think?
Do you agree with this?\[ \Re(e^{a+bi}) = e^a\cos(b) \]
It certainly makes sense.
No, that's what I just said right before that. Just think of it as being on conic sections.
Wait, so they're not equal?
Huh, no they are equal. \[\Large \cos(ix)=\cosh(x)\]
Okay, well hold on, I want to work this out.
First, it is tempting to say: \[ e^z=e^{a+bi} = e^a\bigg(\cos(b)+i\sin(b)\bigg) \]But consider: \[ e^{z} = e^{i(z/i)} = \bigg(\cos(z/i)+i\sin(z/i)\bigg) = \bigg(\cos(b-ai)+i\sin(b-ai)\bigg) \]Will they result in same answer? Maybe so.
I don't know I am just making this up as I go, but it seems like we can figure it out from this picture: |dw:1419212363522:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!