Digit manipulation proof, elucidate me. \[0.999... = 1\] I understand how the infinite series and sequences proof works however, why is the digit manipulation proof valid? \[x = 0.999... \\ 10x = 9.999... \\ 10x = 9 + 0.999... \\ 10x = 9 + x \\ 9x = 9 \\ x = 1 \] I will expand in the thread below.
We already know that \(x = 0.999...\). Step 2 where \(10x = 9.999...\) should not come after: \(10 + 0.999... = 9.999...\) Not what ever they did?
As in we know what \(x\) is, what are we doing by manipulating it?
10*0.99999.....= 9.9999999.....
10+.99999= 10.999999
Oops silly my mistake.
:)
However why are we solving for \(x\) since we already know what the value is?
where did you read this proof?
tell them to prove that 10*.9999.... = 9.99999....
thats a standard trick for converting repeated decimals to fractions
@ganeshie8 care to share this standard trick?
if you want more practice, try converting \(0.123123123123123\ldots\) to fraction follow the exact same steps :)
i think this video explains it better than wiki https://www.khanacademy.org/math/algebra/solving-linear-equations-and-inequalities/conv_rep_decimals/v/coverting-repeating-decimals-to-fractions-1
However this step: \(9x = 9\) We know that \(x = 0.999...\) \[9x = 9 \\ 9 * 0.999... \ne 9\] It should return a value less than 9 right? For example: \[9 * 0.99 = 8.91\]
9x = 8.999... = 9
Round up dat figure ;)
\(0.99999999999999999999 \ne 1\) however \(0.999\ldots = 1\)
I know that to be true via the infinite series and sequences proof. However how is the current proof true?
Orange = Black
after reaching 9x = 9 you move ahead, dont look back. divide 9 both sides
if you look back, you will get a repeating decimal again and you will be in circles
\[x = 0.999... \\ 10x = 9.999... \\ 10x = 9 + 0.999... \leftarrow here\\ 10(0.999) \ne 9 + 0.999... \\ 10x = 9 + x \\ 9x = 9 \\ x = 1\] Never mind that, so the proof can only be read forward not backward? Fascinating.
you read it back wards if you want to prove that 1 = 0.999999....
Prove that an untrue statement is true o-o
there is a mistake here : \[ x = 0.999... \\ 10x = 9.999... \\ 10x = 9 + 0.999... \leftarrow here\\ \color{red}{10(0.999) \ne 9 + 0.999... \\} 10x = 9 + x \\ 9x = 9 \\ x = 1 \]
both sides will be equal if you replace "0.999" by "0.999..." on left hand side
\[1:x = 0.999... \\ 2:10x = 9.999... \\ 3:10x = 9 + 0.999... \leftarrow here\\ 4:10(0.999) \ne 9 + 0.999... \\ \text{Step 4 makes no sense since we know from the beginning that x = 0.999...} \\ 5:10x = 9 + x \\ 6:9x = 9 \\ 7:x = 1\] Oh wait I see my mistake, I jumped, I took from step 1 when I was working backwards instead of taking from step 7. Thank you @ganeshie8 it makes sense now.
looks good!
food for thought : ...999999999999999999999 +1 -------------------------- ...000000000000000000000
it may not be that exciting to you as you're good with computers and programming
Is repeating numbers any different than the concept of infinity?
i think it can be explained easily using overflow/carry...
perform below operation on a 4 bit computer and see the contents of accumulator : ``` ADD F 1 ```
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!