Ask your own question, for FREE!
Biology 14 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

What do scientists now think about the basis of life and why did they reject the theory of vitalism?

OpenStudy (surryyy):

Vitalism is the doctrine, often advocated in the past but now rejected by mainstream science, that "living organisms are fundamentally different from non-living entities because they contain some non-physical element or are governed by different principles than are inanimate things".

OpenStudy (abhisar):

\(\bf Vitalism\) or \(\bf Vital~Force\) theory was a belief around 1600 that all the organic matters contain a `Vital force of life` which can not be synthesised artificially from inorganic constituents. This was rejected as Friedrich Wohler was able to synthesise urea (an organic compound) from inorganic components in 1828.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!