Which is a counterexample to this conjecture? The sum of any two consecutive integers is a composite number. A. 16 + 17 = 33 B. 10 + 11 = 21 C. 6 + 7 = 13 D. 7 + 8 = 15
@SolomonZelman
I am realy realy bad at math.
try to find two consecutive integers that add to a prime number
what is composite number?
A number that has one and itself.
what about 13?
Does 13 have one and itself as multiples.
33=1*3*11 21=1*3*7 13=1*13 15=1*3*5 1 is factor of every number. so you can know.
\(\normalsize\color{blue}{ \rm Composite~~numbers }\), are the opposite of prime numbers. \(\normalsize\color{blue}{ \rm Composite~~numbers }\): \(\normalsize\color{blue}{ \rm 4 }\) (can be divisible by 2) \(\normalsize\color{blue}{ \rm 6 }\) (can be divisible by 2 & 3) \(\normalsize\color{blue}{ \rm 8 }\) (can be divisible by 2 & 4) \(\normalsize\color{blue}{ \rm 9 }\) (can be divisible by 3) \(\normalsize\color{blue}{ \rm 10 }\) (can be divisible by 2 & 5) and etc., \(\normalsize\color{red}{ \rm Prime~~numbers }\) would be starting like: \(\normalsize\color{red}{ \rm 2 }\), \(\normalsize\color{red}{ \rm 3 }\), \(\normalsize\color{red}{ \rm 7 }\), \(\normalsize\color{red}{ \rm 11 }\) and \(\normalsize\color{red}{ \rm on... }\)
yes 13 is a composite number.
I mean prime sorry.
yes, it prime
prime numbers have one and itself as multiples.
\(\normalsize\color{red}{ \rm prime~~number }\) can be only divided by \(\normalsize\color{red}{ \rm itself }\) and by \(\normalsize\color{red}{ \rm 1 }\). Like, \(\normalsize\color{red}{ \rm 13 }\) can be only divided by \(\normalsize\color{red}{ \rm 13 }\) (itself), or by \(\normalsize\color{red}{ \rm 1 }\) .
do you understand the conjecture?
or not?
I understand.
|dw:1420068800686:dw|
just to make sure, which answer choice did you choose?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!