integral
no actually got lost on it
\[\int\limits \sin(x^2) dx\]
can you give me a hint?
Fresnel integral: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fresnel_integral I'm afraid there's no closed form :/
sure, but that form that includes the sum notation, how would I come to it? by doing integration by parts, many times?
"No closed form" generally means you won't be able to find an antiderivative, at least not in terms of elementary functions (i.e. polynomials, trig functions, exponentials, logarithms etc)
yes, I see... like for example e^x/x would be something like sigma, infinity terms, i=0 for (n! e^x / x(x)^n)
I mean n=0, not i=0
and I want to know how to come to this not-closed form
and that e^x/x I would get the sigma, but integrating by parts many times, differentiating the bottom x each time
But in this case, (I mean,) how would I get the sigma notation answer?
I can elaborate if you want, I sound pretty confusing....
use power series of sin(x) to express sin(x^2) as an infinite sum
I see the power series for sin(x), so sin(x^2) would be x^3/ 3 - x^7 /3!7 + x^11/5!11 + x^15/7!..... right?
maybe use the sum notation.. \[\begin{align}\sin (\color{Red}{x}) &=\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)!}\color{Red}{x}^{2n+1} \\~\\ \sin (\color{Red}{x^2}) &=\cdots \end{align}\]
just replace x by x^2
\[=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)!}x^{4x+2}\]
I was never good at those, but this should fine, after you chewed it for me:D
:) these are fun Careful.. x is your function variable and "n" is the temporary index variable in sum
I am aware, tnx
maybe use the sum notation.. \[\begin{align}\sin (\color{Red}{x}) &=\sum\limits_{\color{blue}{n}=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)!}\color{Red}{x}^{2\color{blue}{n}+1} \\~\\ \sin (\color{Red}{x^2}) &=\sum\limits_{\color{blue}{n}=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)!}\color{Red}{x}^{4\color{blue}{n}+2} \end{align}\]
I will try to get a tutor, to go over this entire power series thing. I haven't spent time studying it in school.... nice colors, btw. are you able to put this inline?
or it's impossible?
yeah, the integration part, as much as I could get, I got.
Nice integral for the day !
pain in my a... jK
right click on the reply and click "Show Math As" ---> "Tex commands" it shows you the latex code..
I thought that integration by parts would remove any questions..
Angle -Angle -Side
tnx.
If I see anyone put an inline sigma, then I would make sure to copy the command and put in in my latex
Btw, do you know anyone who knows how to do it, so that I can msg?
I mean to put inline sigmas, and integrals but so that they look nice, not messed up.
Power series are powerful because the integral of infinite sum equals the sum of integral of each term with the same radius of convergence
All that means is that you can switch \(\large \int\) and \(\large \sum\) signs when you're dealing with power series (conditions apply)
not this way, \(\ \sum_{n=c_1}^{c_2}f(n) \)
but a normal, nice looking on?
copy paste below exact code ``` \[\begin{align} \sin (\color{Red}{x}) &=\sum\limits_{\color{blue}{n}=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)!}\color{Red}{x}^{2\color{blue}{n}+1} \\~\\ \sin (\color{Red}{x^2}) &=\sum\limits_{\color{blue}{n}=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^n}{(2n+1)!}\color{Red}{x}^{4\color{blue}{n}+2} \\~\\ \end{align}\] ```
`\(\sum_{n=1}^\infty\)` gives \(\sum_{n=1}^\infty\), whereas `\(\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty\)` gives \(\displaystyle\sum_{n=1}^\infty\).
oh cool, tnx!
for an integral you would also add \displaystyle?
and for a limit too?
Yes, though you also have the option of the `\limits` command if you want to keep the small size. Example: `\(\sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty\)` yields \(\sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty\).
\(\large \displaystyle \lim_{x \rightarrow a} f(x) \)
\(\large \displaystyle \lim_{x \rightarrow a} f(x) \) works!
oh, it's not hard...
How did you know to do this, this is a very nice trick, (the displaystyle) !
you wont be needing them if you use `\[ \]` instead of the inline code `\( \)` only the inline latex doesn't know where to put the limits
limits work with inline latex as well
`\[ \sum_a^b \]` produces below \[ \sum_a^b \]
\(\large \displaystyle \lim_{x \rightarrow a} f(x) \) oh \(\large \displaystyle \int\limits_{a}^{b} f(x)~dx \) snap
yes you mayh use `\limits` explicitly in inline code..
The limits `\limits` stuff also works with other commands, like `\bigcup`, `\bigcap`, `\sup`, etc: \(\bigcup_{x\in X}\iff\bigcup\limits_{x\in X}\) \(\bigcap_{x\in X}\iff\bigcap\limits_{x\in X}\) \(\sup_{x\in X}f(x)\iff\sup\limits_{x\in X}f(x)\)
sup? don't even want to learn that... omg...
hey, sup?
jk
alright, I guess I am done with math for now
\(\huge \color{blue }{ت}\)
tnx @ganeshie8 @SithsAndGiggles my patience (:D) marki, :PPPP
:P :P
\(\large T~~H~~A~~N~~K \small\displaystyle \int_{}^{} x~dx \)
got to go. excuse me discúlpeme jk
ganeshie8... I am leaving... don't get too excited:P jk
I just got to go, but not for ever though, so sure.. go ahead...
\(\boxed{:O} \)
bye
ur funny :P bbye
\(\huge \color{red}{\ddot \smile} \)
huh my T in cuter :P
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!