Ask your own question, for FREE!
History 14 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Why did the Lend-Lease program anger isolationists? @micahm @Secret-Ninja

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Why did the Lend-Lease program anger isolationists? It was seen as way to undermine the Neutrality Acts. It was seen as a drain on the U.S. Treasury. It was seen as a support for the Axis powers. It was seen as a direct violation of U.S. law.

OpenStudy (micahm):

Why did the Lend-Lease program anger isolationists www.answers.com › Wiki Answers › Categories › Uncategorized Why did the Lend-Lease program anger isolationists? ... the us said it wanted to be neutral in the war but the lend-lease act that the usa made with britain let the ...

OpenStudy (micahm):

Neutrality Acts of 1930s - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrality_Acts_of_1930s Wikipedia They were spurred by the growth in isolationism and non-interventionism in ... Roosevelt felt he could not afford to snub the South and anger public opinion, ... However, this act did not cover "civil wars," such as that in Spain (1936–1939), nor did it ... The end of neutrality policy came with the Lend-Lease Act of March 1941, ...

OpenStudy (secret-ninja):

"Proposed in late 1940 and passed in March 1941, the Lend-Lease Act was the principal means for providing U.S. military aid to foreign nations during World War II. It authorized the president to transfer arms or any other defense materials for which Congress appropriated money to the government of any country whose defense the President deems vital to the defense of the United States. By allowing the transfer of supplies without compensation to Britain, China, the Soviet Union and other countries, the act permitted the United States to support its war interests without being overextended in battle." "Isolationism is a category of foreign policies institutionalized by leaders who asserted that their nations' best interests were best served by keeping the affairs of other countries at a distance."

OpenStudy (anonymous):

...

OpenStudy (micahm):

It was seen as a way to undermine the Neutrality Acts.

OpenStudy (secret-ninja):

It was seen as way to undermine the Neutrality Acts. It was seen as a drain on the U.S. Treasury. -----> I don't think that countries that want to be left alone care much about what is happening on the outside, much less their money problems. It was seen as a support for the Axis powers. -----> The axis powers were against the U.S and Britain. It was seen as a direct violation of U.S. law. -----> I don't know why a country that was isolated would want to know about the U.S. law.

OpenStudy (micahm):

A

OpenStudy (secret-ninja):

So A is left, as @micahm stated. ^-^

OpenStudy (secret-ninja):

I gtg I'll be back in about 20 minutes. Micahm can help mean while. :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh okay, thank you both I wish I could best response more than one person :/ your both awesome

OpenStudy (micahm):

team work is the best

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I agree I have a couple more if you guy are interested:) also if it looks like I am not veiwing the question ita my comp I 90% of the time am on the question reading replies. But my butt head of a computer is REAAAALLLYYY SLOOOWW lol

OpenStudy (micahm):

love too

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!